Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Brazil
Brazil: Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre was 0.4607 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Brazil, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
Brazil recorded 0.4607 units per square kilometre for population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.8% on the previous year and up 54.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Brazil peaked at 0.4607 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.0517 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Brazil 158th out of 215 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Brazil, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0517 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0539 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1963 | 0.0564 units per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1964 | 0.0591 units per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1965 | 0.0618 units per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1966 | 0.0645 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1967 | 0.067 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0695 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1969 | 0.0721 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1970 | 0.0747 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1971 | 0.0773 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1972 | 0.08 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1973 | 0.0829 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1974 | 0.086 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1975 | 0.0893 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1976 | 0.0926 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1977 | 0.0958 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1978 | 0.0989 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1979 | 0.1019 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1980 | 0.1047 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1981 | 0.1074 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1982 | 0.1099 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1983 | 0.1125 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1984 | 0.1154 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1985 | 0.1187 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1986 | 0.1226 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1987 | 0.1273 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1988 | 0.1325 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1989 | 0.1382 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1990 | 0.144 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1991 | 0.1495 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1992 | 0.155 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1993 | 0.1602 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1994 | 0.1652 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1995 | 0.1699 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1996 | 0.1744 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1997 | 0.1788 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1998 | 0.1829 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1999 | 0.1867 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2000 | 0.1907 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2001 | 0.1954 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2002 | 0.2011 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2003 | 0.2078 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2004 | 0.2157 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2005 | 0.2243 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2006 | 0.2331 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2007 | 0.2419 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2008 | 0.2507 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2009 | 0.2595 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2010 | 0.2684 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2011 | 0.2773 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2012 | 0.287 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2013 | 0.2989 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2014 | 0.3136 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2015 | 0.3301 units per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2016 | 0.3477 units per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2017 | 0.3659 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2018 | 0.3836 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2019 | 0.4001 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2020 | 0.4152 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2021 | 0.4292 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2022 | 0.4439 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2023 | 0.4607 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0618 units per square kilometre | 0.0517 units per square kilometre | 0.0721 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0879 units per square kilometre | 0.0747 units per square kilometre | 0.1019 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1189 units per square kilometre | 0.1047 units per square kilometre | 0.1382 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1667 units per square kilometre | 0.144 units per square kilometre | 0.1867 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.222 units per square kilometre | 0.1907 units per square kilometre | 0.2595 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.3273 units per square kilometre | 0.2684 units per square kilometre | 0.4001 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.4373 units per square kilometre | 0.4152 units per square kilometre | 0.4607 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 155 Equatorial Guinea 0.5111 units per square kilometre compare
- 156 Nicaragua 0.5043 units per square kilometre compare
- 157 New Zealand 0.4891 units per square kilometre compare
- 159 Lesotho 0.4526 units per square kilometre compare
- 160 Djibouti 0.4359 units per square kilometre compare
- 161 Burkina Faso 0.4149 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Brazil
- Un projection of annual infant deaths, annual growth rate -1.86 % change on previous year (2100)
- Heat deaths vs projected death rates, annual growth rate 0.1539 % change on previous year (2090)
- Estimated changes in temperature-related death rates compared to projected death rates 1,496 deaths per 1,000 people (2090)
- Number of infants who die before age 1 3,476 deaths (2100)
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled 0 (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, annual growth rate -1.66 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per capita 0.0296 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, annual growth rate -1.63 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Brazil?
- Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Brazil was 0.4607 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 0.4607 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0517 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Brazil rank for population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre?
- Brazil ranks 158th out of 215 countries with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 54.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 65-69, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 65-69, male ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 65-69, male World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 65-69, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.