Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre was 1.57 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
1.57 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 1.6%
Rank
11th
of 43 groups
All-time high
1.57 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.2891 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income stood at 1.57 units per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 1.6% on the previous year and up 65.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income peaked at 1.57 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.2891 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Upper middle income ranks 11th of 43 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2891 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.2933 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1963 | 0.2982 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1964 | 0.3029 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1965 | 0.3109 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1966 | 0.3225 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1967 | 0.3352 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1968 | 0.3498 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1969 | 0.3651 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1970 | 0.3784 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1971 | 0.3898 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1972 | 0.3996 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1973 | 0.4087 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1974 | 0.4189 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1975 | 0.4292 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1976 | 0.4383 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1977 | 0.4483 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1978 | 0.4599 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1979 | 0.472 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1980 | 0.4826 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1981 | 0.491 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1982 | 0.498 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1983 | 0.5039 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1984 | 0.5102 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1985 | 0.5203 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1986 | 0.5351 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1987 | 0.553 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1988 | 0.5747 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1989 | 0.597 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1990 | 0.6175 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1991 | 0.6363 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1992 | 0.5926 units per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1993 | 0.6113 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1994 | 0.6295 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1995 | 0.6464 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1996 | 0.664 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1997 | 0.6825 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1998 | 0.7009 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1999 | 0.7175 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2000 | 0.7341 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2001 | 0.7533 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2002 | 0.7712 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2003 | 0.7854 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2004 | 0.7966 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2005 | 0.8065 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2006 | 0.8141 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2007 | 0.8217 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2008 | 0.8266 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2009 | 0.8343 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2010 | 0.8476 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2011 | 0.8683 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2012 | 0.9015 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2013 | 0.9482 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2014 | 1.01 units per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2015 | 1.08 units per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2016 | 1.16 units per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2017 | 1.24 units per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2018 | 1.32 units per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 2019 | 1.4 units per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2020 | 1.46 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2021 | 1.5 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2022 | 1.54 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2023 | 1.57 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3186 units per square kilometre | 0.2891 units per square kilometre | 0.3651 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.4243 units per square kilometre | 0.3784 units per square kilometre | 0.472 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.5266 units per square kilometre | 0.4826 units per square kilometre | 0.597 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6498 units per square kilometre | 0.5926 units per square kilometre | 0.7175 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.7944 units per square kilometre | 0.7341 units per square kilometre | 0.8343 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.08 units per square kilometre | 0.8476 units per square kilometre | 1.4 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.52 units per square kilometre | 1.46 units per square kilometre | 1.57 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 8 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 35.44 units per square kilometre compare
- 9 Channel Islands 22.66 units per square kilometre compare
- 10 Aruba 21.48 units per square kilometre compare
- 11 Barbados 21.12 units per square kilometre compare
- 12 Korea 17.38 units per square kilometre compare
- 13 San Marino 16.67 units per square kilometre compare
- 14 Saint Martin (French Part) 16.46 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Upper middle income
- Population ages 35-39, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, male, annual growth rate 1.94 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per capita 0.0359 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, annual growth rate 1.71 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per capita 0.0413 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, annual growth rate 2.11 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, female, per capita 0.0394 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 30-34, female, annual growth rate -3.39 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income?
- Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income was 1.57 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 1.57 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2891 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Upper middle income rank for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre?
- Upper middle income ranks 11th out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 65.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 65-69, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 65-69, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.