Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income): Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre was 0.7882 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) stood at 0.7882 units per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 3.9% on the previous year and up 50.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) peaked at 0.7882 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.1125 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 23rd of 43 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1125 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1161 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1963 | 0.1195 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1964 | 0.1229 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1965 | 0.1262 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1966 | 0.13 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1967 | 0.1345 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1968 | 0.1392 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1969 | 0.144 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1970 | 0.1483 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1971 | 0.1522 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1972 | 0.1557 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1973 | 0.1591 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1974 | 0.1625 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1975 | 0.1663 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1976 | 0.1704 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1977 | 0.1743 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1978 | 0.1779 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1979 | 0.1817 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1980 | 0.1859 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1981 | 0.1904 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1982 | 0.1955 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1983 | 0.2017 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1984 | 0.2088 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1985 | 0.2166 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1986 | 0.2251 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1987 | 0.2346 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1988 | 0.2444 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1989 | 0.2542 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1990 | 0.2644 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1991 | 0.2732 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1992 | 0.2824 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1993 | 0.2918 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1994 | 0.3015 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1995 | 0.3116 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1996 | 0.3223 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1997 | 0.3334 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1998 | 0.3444 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1999 | 0.3548 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2000 | 0.3641 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2001 | 0.3727 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2002 | 0.3817 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2003 | 0.3906 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2004 | 0.3987 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2005 | 0.4066 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2006 | 0.415 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2007 | 0.4237 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2008 | 0.4338 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2009 | 0.4467 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2010 | 0.4625 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2011 | 0.4811 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2012 | 0.5016 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2013 | 0.5223 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2014 | 0.5426 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2015 | 0.5638 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2016 | 0.587 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2017 | 0.6128 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2018 | 0.6415 units per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2019 | 0.6727 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2020 | 0.7028 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2021 | 0.7306 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2022 | 0.7587 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2023 | 0.7882 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1272 units per square kilometre | 0.1125 units per square kilometre | 0.144 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1648 units per square kilometre | 0.1483 units per square kilometre | 0.1817 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2157 units per square kilometre | 0.1859 units per square kilometre | 0.2542 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.308 units per square kilometre | 0.2644 units per square kilometre | 0.3548 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.4034 units per square kilometre | 0.3641 units per square kilometre | 0.4467 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.5588 units per square kilometre | 0.4625 units per square kilometre | 0.6727 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7451 units per square kilometre | 0.7028 units per square kilometre | 0.7882 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
- 20 Puerto Rico 13.33 units per square kilometre compare
- 21 Curacao 11.74 units per square kilometre compare
- 22 Belgium 11.4 units per square kilometre compare
- 23 United States Virgin Islands 11.2 units per square kilometre compare
- 24 Lebanon 10.74 units per square kilometre compare
- 25 Japan 10.27 units per square kilometre compare
- 26 Israel 8.91 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
- Population ages 35-39, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, male, annual growth rate 3.11 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per capita 0.0305 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, annual growth rate 3.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per capita 0.0351 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, annual growth rate 1.51 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, female, per capita 0.0341 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 30-34, female, annual growth rate 0.4849 % change on previous year (2025)
All data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)?
- Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) was 0.7882 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 0.7882 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1125 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) rank for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 23rd out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 50.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 65-69, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 65-69, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.