Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income
Lower middle income: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre was 1.84 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
1.84 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 3.3%
Rank
9th
of 43 groups
All-time high
1.84 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.3145 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income is 1.84 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.3% on the previous year and up 50.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income peaked at 1.84 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.3145 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Lower middle income ranks 9th of 43 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.3145 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.331 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1963 | 0.3499 units per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1964 | 0.3666 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1965 | 0.3796 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1966 | 0.389 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1967 | 0.3949 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1968 | 0.3996 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1969 | 0.4061 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1970 | 0.4152 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1971 | 0.4261 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1972 | 0.4396 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1973 | 0.4549 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1974 | 0.4698 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1975 | 0.4834 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1976 | 0.4959 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1977 | 0.5074 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1978 | 0.5185 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1979 | 0.5303 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1980 | 0.5428 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1981 | 0.5558 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1982 | 0.5695 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1983 | 0.5838 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1984 | 0.5987 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1985 | 0.6143 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1986 | 0.6307 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1987 | 0.6478 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1988 | 0.6655 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1989 | 0.6841 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1990 | 0.7042 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1991 | 0.7247 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1992 | 0.7161 units per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1993 | 0.7377 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1994 | 0.7602 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1995 | 0.783 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1996 | 0.8063 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1997 | 0.8298 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1998 | 0.8533 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1999 | 0.8766 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2000 | 0.8991 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2001 | 0.9222 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2002 | 0.9461 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2003 | 0.9699 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2004 | 0.9919 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2005 | 1.01 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2006 | 1.03 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2007 | 1.05 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2008 | 1.07 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2009 | 1.09 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2010 | 1.12 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2011 | 1.15 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2012 | 1.19 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2013 | 1.23 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2014 | 1.27 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2015 | 1.33 units per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2016 | 1.4 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2017 | 1.47 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2018 | 1.54 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2019 | 1.62 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2020 | 1.68 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2021 | 1.73 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2022 | 1.78 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2023 | 1.84 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3701 units per square kilometre | 0.3145 units per square kilometre | 0.4061 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.4741 units per square kilometre | 0.4152 units per square kilometre | 0.5303 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6093 units per square kilometre | 0.5428 units per square kilometre | 0.6841 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.7792 units per square kilometre | 0.7042 units per square kilometre | 0.8766 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9974 units per square kilometre | 0.8991 units per square kilometre | 1.09 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.33 units per square kilometre | 1.12 units per square kilometre | 1.62 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.76 units per square kilometre | 1.68 units per square kilometre | 1.84 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Lower middle income
- 6 Malta 48.62 units per square kilometre compare
- 7 Bermuda 43.85 units per square kilometre compare
- 8 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 35.44 units per square kilometre compare
- 9 Channel Islands 22.66 units per square kilometre compare
- 10 Aruba 21.48 units per square kilometre compare
- 11 Barbados 21.12 units per square kilometre compare
- 12 Korea 17.38 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Lower middle income
- Population ages 35-39, female, per capita 0.0347 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, male, annual growth rate 2.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per capita 0.031 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, annual growth rate 2.83 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per capita 0.0359 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, annual growth rate 1.33 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 30-34, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income?
- Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income was 1.84 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre recorded in Lower middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 1.84 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre recorded in Lower middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3145 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Lower middle income rank for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre?
- Lower middle income ranks 9th out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Lower middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 50.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Lower middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 65-69, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 65-69, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.