Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre was 1.41 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
1.41 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 2.3%
Rank
13th
of 43 groups
All-time high
1.41 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.265 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Low & middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Low & middle income is 1.41 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 2.3% on the previous year and up 58.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Low & middle income peaked at 1.41 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.265 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Low & middle income 13th out of 43 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.265 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.2721 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1963 | 0.2802 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1964 | 0.2876 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1965 | 0.296 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1966 | 0.3056 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1967 | 0.3149 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1968 | 0.3251 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1969 | 0.3361 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1970 | 0.3467 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1971 | 0.3566 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1972 | 0.3663 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1973 | 0.3761 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1974 | 0.3864 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1975 | 0.3965 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1976 | 0.4055 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1977 | 0.4148 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1978 | 0.4249 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1979 | 0.4355 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1980 | 0.4454 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1981 | 0.4541 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1982 | 0.4623 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1983 | 0.4702 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1984 | 0.4784 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1985 | 0.4892 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1986 | 0.5029 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1987 | 0.5186 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1988 | 0.5366 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1989 | 0.5552 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1990 | 0.5731 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1991 | 0.5901 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1992 | 0.5665 units per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1993 | 0.5755 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1994 | 0.5926 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1995 | 0.609 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1996 | 0.626 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1997 | 0.6436 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1998 | 0.6611 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1999 | 0.6776 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2000 | 0.694 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2001 | 0.7121 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2002 | 0.7298 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2003 | 0.7454 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2004 | 0.7572 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2005 | 0.769 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2006 | 0.7793 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2007 | 0.7892 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2008 | 0.7977 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2009 | 0.809 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2010 | 0.8251 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2011 | 0.847 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2012 | 0.8492 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2013 | 0.8864 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2014 | 0.9324 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2015 | 0.9893 units per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2016 | 1.05 units per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2017 | 1.11 units per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2018 | 1.18 units per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2019 | 1.24 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2020 | 1.3 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2021 | 1.34 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2022 | 1.37 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2023 | 1.41 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2981 units per square kilometre | 0.265 units per square kilometre | 0.3361 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.3909 units per square kilometre | 0.3467 units per square kilometre | 0.4355 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4913 units per square kilometre | 0.4454 units per square kilometre | 0.5552 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6115 units per square kilometre | 0.5665 units per square kilometre | 0.6776 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.7583 units per square kilometre | 0.694 units per square kilometre | 0.809 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.9919 units per square kilometre | 0.8251 units per square kilometre | 1.24 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.35 units per square kilometre | 1.3 units per square kilometre | 1.41 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
- 10 Aruba 21.48 units per square kilometre compare
- 11 Barbados 21.12 units per square kilometre compare
- 12 Korea 17.38 units per square kilometre compare
- 13 San Marino 16.67 units per square kilometre compare
- 14 Saint Martin (French Part) 16.46 units per square kilometre compare
- 15 Mauritius 16.2 units per square kilometre compare
- 16 Netherlands 15.6 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Low & middle income
- Population ages 30-34, male, per capita 0.0379 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, annual growth rate 2.32 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per capita 0.0373 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, annual growth rate 1.93 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, female, per capita 0.036 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, female, annual growth rate 1.74 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 25-29, male, per capita 0.0388 units per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Low & middle income?
- Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Low & middle income was 1.41 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 1.41 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.265 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Low & middle income rank for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre?
- Low & middle income ranks 13th out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 58.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 65-69, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 65-69, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.