Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in High income
High income: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre was 0.8101 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
0.8101 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 1.9%
Rank
22nd
of 43 groups
All-time high
0.8101 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.4792 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in High income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in High income stood at 0.8101 units per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 1.9% on the previous year and up 25.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in High income peaked at 0.8101 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.4792 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places High income 22nd out of 43 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in High income, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.4792 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.4912 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1963 | 0.5017 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1964 | 0.5121 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1965 | 0.5275 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1966 | 0.5435 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1967 | 0.5581 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1968 | 0.5731 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1969 | 0.5872 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1970 | 0.5985 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1971 | 0.609 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1972 | 0.6217 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1973 | 0.6356 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1974 | 0.6501 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1975 | 0.6647 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1976 | 0.6778 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1977 | 0.6901 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1978 | 0.7012 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1979 | 0.7094 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1980 | 0.7082 units per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1981 | 0.6914 units per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1982 | 0.6628 units per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1983 | 0.6332 units per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1984 | 0.6153 units per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1985 | 0.6203 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1986 | 0.6479 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1987 | 0.6865 units per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1988 | 0.7282 units per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1989 | 0.763 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1990 | 0.7847 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1991 | 0.7996 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1992 | 0.5507 units per square kilometre | -31.1% |
| 1993 | 0.5555 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1994 | 0.5594 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1995 | 0.5616 units per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1996 | 0.5618 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.5593 units per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1998 | 0.5545 units per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1999 | 0.5484 units per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2000 | 0.5453 units per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2001 | 0.5469 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2002 | 0.5531 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2003 | 0.5638 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2004 | 0.5773 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2005 | 0.589 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2006 | 0.5972 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2007 | 0.5991 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2008 | 0.5966 units per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2009 | 0.5908 units per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2010 | 0.5817 units per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2011 | 0.5854 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2012 | 0.6112 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2013 | 0.6441 units per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2014 | 0.6799 units per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2015 | 0.7181 units per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2016 | 0.7432 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2017 | 0.7523 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2018 | 0.7576 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2019 | 0.7634 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2020 | 0.7713 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2021 | 0.7829 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2022 | 0.7947 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2023 | 0.8101 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5304 units per square kilometre | 0.4792 units per square kilometre | 0.5872 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.6558 units per square kilometre | 0.5985 units per square kilometre | 0.7094 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6757 units per square kilometre | 0.6153 units per square kilometre | 0.763 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6035 units per square kilometre | 0.5484 units per square kilometre | 0.7996 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.5759 units per square kilometre | 0.5453 units per square kilometre | 0.5991 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.6837 units per square kilometre | 0.5817 units per square kilometre | 0.7634 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7897 units per square kilometre | 0.7713 units per square kilometre | 0.8101 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near High income
- 19 Maldives 14.88 units per square kilometre compare
- 20 Puerto Rico 13.33 units per square kilometre compare
- 21 Curaçao 11.74 units per square kilometre compare
- 22 Belgium 11.4 units per square kilometre compare
- 23 United States Virgin Islands 11.2 units per square kilometre compare
- 24 Lebanon 10.74 units per square kilometre compare
- 25 Japan 10.27 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for High income
- Population ages 35-39, female, annual growth rate -0.0602 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per capita 0.0338 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, annual growth rate -0.0702 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per capita 0.0367 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, annual growth rate 0.4572 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, female, per capita 0.0337 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 25-29, male, per capita 0.0322 units per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in High income?
- Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in High income was 0.8101 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre recorded in High income?
- The highest recorded value was 0.8101 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre recorded in High income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4792 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does High income rank for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre?
- High income ranks 22nd out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in High income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 25.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this High income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 65-69, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 65-69, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.