Population ages 60-64, female, per unit of GDP in Lower middle income
Lower middle income: Population ages 60-64, female, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Population ages 60-64, female, per unit of GDP in Lower middle income, 1960–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 60-64, female, per unit of gdp in Lower middle income is 0 units per US$ of GDP, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 66 years on record.
That represents a change of down 3.9% on the previous year and down 17.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 60-64, female, per unit of gdp in Lower middle income peaked at 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
That places Lower middle income 6th out of 43 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 60-64, female, per unit of GDP in Lower middle income, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 1962 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -4.6% |
| 1963 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 1964 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 1965 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +12.9% |
| 1967 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 1968 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 1969 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 1970 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -7.3% |
| 1971 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -2.1% |
| 1972 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1973 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -13.3% |
| 1974 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.8% |
| 1975 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 1976 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 1977 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 1978 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 1979 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 1980 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.3% |
| 1981 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.3% |
| 1982 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.4% |
| 1983 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.3% |
| 1984 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +8.1% |
| 1985 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 1986 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +4.7% |
| 1987 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 1988 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 1989 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +5.3% |
| 1990 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.6% |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.2% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.5% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.7% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +11.5% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.9% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.8% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.7% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.2% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.9% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.9% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.2% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.5% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Lower middle income
- 3 Madagascar 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 4 Central African Republic 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 5 Myanmar 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 6 Eritrea 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 7 Mozambique 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 8 Syrian Arab Republic 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 9 Gambia 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
More health data for Lower middle income
- Population ages 75-79, male, per capita 0.0046 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 70-74, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 70-74, male, per capita 0.0081 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, female, annual growth rate 5.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, female, per capita 0.0055 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, male, annual growth rate 5.74 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 80 and above, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 80 and above, male, annual growth rate 4.28 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 60-64, female, per unit of gdp in Lower middle income?
- Population ages 60-64, female, per unit of gdp in Lower middle income was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 60-64, female, per unit of gdp recorded in Lower middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP in 1960.
- What is the lowest population ages 60-64, female, per unit of gdp recorded in Lower middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does Lower middle income rank for population ages 60-64, female, per unit of gdp?
- Lower middle income ranks 6th out of 43 groups with data for 2025.
- Is population ages 60-64, female, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Lower middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 17.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lower middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 60-64, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 66 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 60-64, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 60-64, female ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population ages 60-64, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 60-64, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.