Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income
Lower middle income: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre was 2.35 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
2.35 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 2.7%
Rank
9th
of 43 groups
All-time high
2.35 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.47 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income is 2.35 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.7% on the previous year and up 36.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income peaked at 2.35 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.47 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Lower middle income ranks 9th of 43 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.47 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.4773 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1963 | 0.4828 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1964 | 0.4903 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1965 | 0.5008 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1966 | 0.5138 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1967 | 0.5298 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1968 | 0.5474 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1969 | 0.5643 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1970 | 0.5795 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1971 | 0.5928 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1972 | 0.6047 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1973 | 0.6165 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1974 | 0.6289 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1975 | 0.6422 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1976 | 0.6562 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1977 | 0.6713 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1978 | 0.6873 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1979 | 0.704 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1980 | 0.7211 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1981 | 0.7388 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1982 | 0.7574 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1983 | 0.7767 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1984 | 0.797 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1985 | 0.8185 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1986 | 0.8412 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1987 | 0.8652 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1988 | 0.8902 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1989 | 0.9158 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1990 | 0.9428 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1991 | 0.9694 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1992 | 0.9566 units per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1993 | 0.9828 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1994 | 1.01 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1995 | 1.03 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1996 | 1.06 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1997 | 1.08 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1998 | 1.11 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1999 | 1.13 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2000 | 1.15 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2001 | 1.17 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2002 | 1.19 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2003 | 1.21 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2004 | 1.23 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2005 | 1.26 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2006 | 1.29 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2007 | 1.33 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2008 | 1.37 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2009 | 1.42 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2010 | 1.49 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2011 | 1.56 units per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2012 | 1.63 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2013 | 1.72 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2014 | 1.8 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2015 | 1.88 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2016 | 1.95 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2017 | 2.01 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2018 | 2.08 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2019 | 2.13 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2020 | 2.19 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2021 | 2.23 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2022 | 2.29 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2023 | 2.35 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5085 units per square kilometre | 0.47 units per square kilometre | 0.5643 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.6383 units per square kilometre | 0.5795 units per square kilometre | 0.704 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.8122 units per square kilometre | 0.7211 units per square kilometre | 0.9158 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.03 units per square kilometre | 0.9428 units per square kilometre | 1.13 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.26 units per square kilometre | 1.15 units per square kilometre | 1.42 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.82 units per square kilometre | 1.49 units per square kilometre | 2.13 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.26 units per square kilometre | 2.19 units per square kilometre | 2.35 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Lower middle income
- 6 Malta 50.38 units per square kilometre compare
- 7 Bermuda 49.52 units per square kilometre compare
- 8 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 45.41 units per square kilometre compare
- 9 Channel Islands 28.48 units per square kilometre compare
- 10 Aruba 25.1 units per square kilometre compare
- 11 Barbados 24.12 units per square kilometre compare
- 12 Bahrain 23.86 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Lower middle income
- Population ages 75-79, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 70-74, male, annual growth rate 4.54 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 70-74, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 70-74, male, per capita 0.0081 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, female, annual growth rate 5.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, female, per capita 0.0055 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, male, annual growth rate 5.74 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 80 and above, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 80 and above, male, annual growth rate 4.28 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income?
- Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income was 2.35 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre recorded in Lower middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 2.35 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre recorded in Lower middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.47 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Lower middle income rank for population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre?
- Lower middle income ranks 9th out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Lower middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 36.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Lower middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 60-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 60-64, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 60-64, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 60-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.