Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre in East Timor
East Timor: Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre was 1.36 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
1.36 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 4.7%
World rank
135th
of 216 countries
All-time high
1.36 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.3923 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre in East Timor, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre in East Timor is 1.36 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.7% on the previous year and up 39.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre in East Timor peaked at 1.36 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.3923 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
East Timor ranks 135th of 216 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre in East Timor, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.3923 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.4003 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1963 | 0.4069 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1964 | 0.4126 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1965 | 0.4184 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1966 | 0.424 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1967 | 0.4292 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1968 | 0.435 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1969 | 0.4434 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1970 | 0.4546 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1971 | 0.4688 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1972 | 0.4865 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1973 | 0.5053 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1974 | 0.5202 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1975 | 0.5258 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1976 | 0.5244 units per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1977 | 0.5202 units per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1978 | 0.5146 units per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1979 | 0.5112 units per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1980 | 0.5124 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1981 | 0.5162 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1982 | 0.5208 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1983 | 0.5253 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1984 | 0.527 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1985 | 0.5264 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1986 | 0.5241 units per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1987 | 0.5215 units per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1988 | 0.5219 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1989 | 0.5297 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1990 | 0.5473 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1991 | 0.5714 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1992 | 0.5985 units per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1993 | 0.6275 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1994 | 0.6575 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1995 | 0.687 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1996 | 0.7153 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1997 | 0.7424 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1998 | 0.7677 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1999 | 0.681 units per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2000 | 0.6076 units per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 2001 | 0.6619 units per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2002 | 0.7157 units per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2003 | 0.7467 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2004 | 0.7594 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2005 | 0.8063 units per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2006 | 0.8799 units per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2007 | 0.935 units per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2008 | 0.9654 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2009 | 0.9667 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2010 | 0.9502 units per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2011 | 0.9431 units per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2012 | 0.9541 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2013 | 0.9744 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2014 | 0.9999 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2015 | 1.02 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2016 | 1.05 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2017 | 1.08 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2018 | 1.12 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2019 | 1.16 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2020 | 1.21 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2021 | 1.25 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2022 | 1.3 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2023 | 1.36 units per square kilometre | +4.7% |
East Timor compared with similar countries
- East Timor's 1.36 units per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.19 units per square kilometre, 1.1× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- East Timor's 1.36 units per square kilometre is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 2.83 units per square kilometre, 48% of the median. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.418 units per square kilometre | 0.3923 units per square kilometre | 0.4434 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.5032 units per square kilometre | 0.4546 units per square kilometre | 0.5258 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.5225 units per square kilometre | 0.5124 units per square kilometre | 0.5297 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6596 units per square kilometre | 0.5473 units per square kilometre | 0.7677 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.8045 units per square kilometre | 0.6076 units per square kilometre | 0.9667 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.03 units per square kilometre | 0.9431 units per square kilometre | 1.16 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.28 units per square kilometre | 1.21 units per square kilometre | 1.36 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Timor
- 132 Iraq 1.41 units per square kilometre compare
- 133 Georgia 1.41 units per square kilometre compare
- 134 Belarus 1.37 units per square kilometre compare
- 136 Honduras 1.35 units per square kilometre compare
- 137 Faroe Islands 1.35 units per square kilometre compare
- 138 Ethiopia 1.32 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for East Timor
- Un projection of annual infant deaths, annual growth rate -1.22 % change on previous year (2100)
- Heat deaths vs projected death rates, annual growth rate 0.894 % change on previous year (2090)
- Un projection of annual infant deaths 162 (2100)
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled 0 (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, annual growth rate -2.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per capita 0.051 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, annual growth rate -2.04 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per capita 0.0538 units per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre in East Timor?
- Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre in East Timor was 1.36 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre recorded in East Timor?
- The highest recorded value was 1.36 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre recorded in East Timor?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3923 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does East Timor rank for population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre?
- East Timor ranks 135th out of 216 countries with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre rising or falling in East Timor?
- Over the last ten years it is up 39.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this East Timor data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 55-59, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 55-59, male ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 55-59, male World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 55-59, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.