Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre was 2.44 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
2.44 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 0.5%
Rank
12th
of 43 groups
All-time high
2.44 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.5983 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income stood at 2.44 units per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.5% on the previous year and up 35.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income peaked at 2.44 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.5983 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Upper middle income ranks 12th of 43 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.5983 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.6039 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1963 | 0.6134 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1964 | 0.6229 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1965 | 0.6316 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1966 | 0.6402 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1967 | 0.6472 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1968 | 0.651 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1969 | 0.6546 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1970 | 0.6635 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1971 | 0.6792 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1972 | 0.6986 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1973 | 0.7217 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1974 | 0.7478 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1975 | 0.7738 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1976 | 0.7961 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1977 | 0.8171 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1978 | 0.84 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1979 | 0.8598 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1980 | 0.8775 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1981 | 0.8956 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1982 | 0.9131 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1983 | 0.9301 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1984 | 0.9474 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1985 | 0.9654 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1986 | 0.9863 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1987 | 1.01 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1988 | 1.02 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1989 | 1.04 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1990 | 1.05 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1991 | 1.06 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1992 | 0.9622 units per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1993 | 0.9668 units per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1994 | 0.9746 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1995 | 0.9878 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1996 | 1.01 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1997 | 1.04 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1998 | 1.1 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1999 | 1.16 units per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2000 | 1.24 units per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2001 | 1.32 units per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2002 | 1.41 units per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2003 | 1.5 units per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2004 | 1.58 units per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2005 | 1.64 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2006 | 1.69 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2007 | 1.73 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2008 | 1.76 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2009 | 1.76 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2010 | 1.73 units per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2011 | 1.71 units per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2012 | 1.72 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2013 | 1.8 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2014 | 1.94 units per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2015 | 2.07 units per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2016 | 2.21 units per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2017 | 2.29 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2018 | 2.31 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2019 | 2.33 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2020 | 2.36 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2021 | 2.4 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2022 | 2.43 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2023 | 2.44 units per square kilometre | +0.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6292 units per square kilometre | 0.5983 units per square kilometre | 0.6546 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.7598 units per square kilometre | 0.6635 units per square kilometre | 0.8598 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.9585 units per square kilometre | 0.8775 units per square kilometre | 1.04 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.03 units per square kilometre | 0.9622 units per square kilometre | 1.16 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.56 units per square kilometre | 1.24 units per square kilometre | 1.76 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.01 units per square kilometre | 1.71 units per square kilometre | 2.33 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.41 units per square kilometre | 2.36 units per square kilometre | 2.44 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 9 Bahrain 37.09 units per square kilometre compare
- 10 Channel Islands 34.31 units per square kilometre compare
- 11 Maldives 33.19 units per square kilometre compare
- 12 Bangladesh 28.98 units per square kilometre compare
- 13 San Marino 25.07 units per square kilometre compare
- 14 Aruba 23.87 units per square kilometre compare
- 15 Barbados 23.75 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Upper middle income
- Population ages 60-64, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 65-69, male, annual growth rate -1.53 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 65-69, female, per capita 0.0222 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 65-69, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate -1.49 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 60-64, male, per capita 0.0263 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 60-64, female, per capita 0.0282 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 60-64, female, annual growth rate 7.22 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 60-64, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 65-69, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income?
- Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income was 2.44 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 2.44 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5983 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Upper middle income rank for population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre?
- Upper middle income ranks 12th out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 35.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 50-54, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 50-54, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 50-54, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 50-54, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.