Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre was 0.7 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) is 0.7 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 3.3% on the previous year and up 39.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) peaked at 0.7 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.1658 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 39th of 43 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1658 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1695 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1963 | 0.1732 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1964 | 0.177 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1965 | 0.181 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1966 | 0.1849 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1967 | 0.189 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1968 | 0.1932 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1969 | 0.1978 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1970 | 0.2029 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1971 | 0.2081 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1972 | 0.2133 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1973 | 0.2189 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1974 | 0.2243 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1975 | 0.2294 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1976 | 0.2344 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1977 | 0.2392 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1978 | 0.244 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1979 | 0.2488 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1980 | 0.2527 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1981 | 0.2563 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1982 | 0.2608 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1983 | 0.2662 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1984 | 0.2718 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1985 | 0.277 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1986 | 0.2823 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1987 | 0.288 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1988 | 0.2939 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1989 | 0.3 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1990 | 0.3059 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1991 | 0.3116 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1992 | 0.3184 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1993 | 0.3061 units per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 1994 | 0.3143 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1995 | 0.3232 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1996 | 0.3327 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1997 | 0.3423 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1998 | 0.352 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1999 | 0.3615 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2000 | 0.3708 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2001 | 0.3805 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2002 | 0.3917 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2003 | 0.4044 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2004 | 0.4145 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2005 | 0.4284 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2006 | 0.4425 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2007 | 0.4563 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2008 | 0.4711 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2009 | 0.4871 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2010 | 0.5033 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2011 | 0.5204 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2012 | 0.4864 units per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2013 | 0.5027 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2014 | 0.5192 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2015 | 0.5359 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2016 | 0.5533 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2017 | 0.572 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2018 | 0.5917 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2019 | 0.6125 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2020 | 0.6338 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2021 | 0.6556 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2022 | 0.6775 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2023 | 0.7 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1813 units per square kilometre | 0.1658 units per square kilometre | 0.1978 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.2263 units per square kilometre | 0.2029 units per square kilometre | 0.2488 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2749 units per square kilometre | 0.2527 units per square kilometre | 0.3 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.3268 units per square kilometre | 0.3059 units per square kilometre | 0.3615 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.4247 units per square kilometre | 0.3708 units per square kilometre | 0.4871 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.5398 units per square kilometre | 0.4864 units per square kilometre | 0.6125 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.6667 units per square kilometre | 0.6338 units per square kilometre | 0.7 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- 36 Guam 9.39 units per square kilometre compare
- 37 Naoero 9.2 units per square kilometre compare
- 38 Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 9.12 units per square kilometre compare
- 39 Philippines 9.04 units per square kilometre compare
- 40 Rwanda 9.02 units per square kilometre compare
- 41 Luxembourg 8.94 units per square kilometre compare
- 42 Grenada 8.67 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Population ages 60-64, male, annual growth rate 3.79 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 65-69, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate 3.86 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 60-64, male, per capita 0.0082 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 60-64, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 60-64, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 55-59, male, per capita 0.011 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 60-64, female, annual growth rate 3.42 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 65-69, female, per capita 0.0071 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 60-64, female, per capita 0.0094 units per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) was 0.7 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The highest recorded value was 0.7 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1658 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank for population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 39th out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 39.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 50-54, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 50-54, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 50-54, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 50-54, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.