Population ages 45-49, female, per unit of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend
Pre-demographic dividend: Population ages 45-49, female, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Population ages 45-49, female, per unit of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend, 1960–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Pre-demographic dividend recorded 0 units per US$ of GDP for population ages 45-49, female, per unit of gdp in 2025.
The figure is down 5.6% on the previous year and up 13.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 45-49, female, per unit of gdp in Pre-demographic dividend peaked at 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2014.
That places Pre-demographic dividend 4th out of 43 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 45-49, female, per unit of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 1962 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 1963 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -11.5% |
| 1964 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +8.1% |
| 1965 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 1966 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1967 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +7.5% |
| 1968 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 1969 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 1970 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 1971 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +3.4% |
| 1972 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -13.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -17.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -25.7% |
| 1975 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 1976 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1977 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 1978 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
| 1979 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.2% |
| 1980 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 1981 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -25.5% |
| 1982 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.5% |
| 1983 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +23.2% |
| 1984 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +9.4% |
| 1985 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 1986 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +17.7% |
| 1987 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 1988 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 1989 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.1% |
| 1990 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -36.8% |
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +80.9% |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +31.9% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.6% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.4% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -30.2% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.4% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +66.2% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +8.4% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.0% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.9% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.4% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.0% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.4% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +13.9% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.7% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +21.9% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +16.5% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.9% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.0% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +13.4% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +14.6% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +14.8% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Pre-demographic dividend
- 1 Burundi 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 2 Afghanistan 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 3 Madagascar 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 4 Mozambique 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 5 Eritrea 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 6 Malawi 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 7 Yemen 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
More health data for Pre-demographic dividend
- Population ages 60-64, male, annual growth rate 3.98 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 65-69, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate 3.28 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 60-64, male, per capita 0.0081 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 60-64, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 60-64, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 55-59, male, per capita 0.011 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 60-64, female, annual growth rate 3.51 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 65-69, female, per capita 0.0068 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 60-64, female, per capita 0.0091 units per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 45-49, female, per unit of gdp in Pre-demographic dividend?
- Population ages 45-49, female, per unit of gdp in Pre-demographic dividend was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 45-49, female, per unit of gdp recorded in Pre-demographic dividend?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP in 1960.
- What is the lowest population ages 45-49, female, per unit of gdp recorded in Pre-demographic dividend?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2014.
- How does Pre-demographic dividend rank for population ages 45-49, female, per unit of gdp?
- Pre-demographic dividend ranks 4th out of 43 groups with data for 2025.
- Is population ages 45-49, female, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Pre-demographic dividend?
- Over the last ten years it is up 13.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Pre-demographic dividend data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 45-49, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 66 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 45-49, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 45-49, female ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population ages 45-49, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 45-49, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.