Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre was 1.25 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe is 1.25 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 4.2% on the previous year and up 61.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe peaked at 1.32 units per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0.2266 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Zimbabwe 166th out of 216 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2266 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.2331 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1963 | 0.2412 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1964 | 0.2488 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1965 | 0.2549 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1966 | 0.26 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1967 | 0.2639 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1968 | 0.2672 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1969 | 0.2711 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1970 | 0.276 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1971 | 0.2813 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1972 | 0.2867 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1973 | 0.2927 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1974 | 0.2997 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1975 | 0.3071 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1976 | 0.314 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1977 | 0.318 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1978 | 0.3135 units per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1979 | 0.3051 units per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 1980 | 0.3214 units per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1981 | 0.3484 units per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1982 | 0.3641 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1983 | 0.3778 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1984 | 0.4025 units per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1985 | 0.4417 units per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1986 | 0.4831 units per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1987 | 0.5274 units per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1988 | 0.5735 units per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1989 | 0.6048 units per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1990 | 0.6199 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1991 | 0.6321 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1992 | 0.6506 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1993 | 0.6488 units per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1994 | 0.6228 units per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1995 | 0.6077 units per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1996 | 0.6028 units per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1997 | 0.6021 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1998 | 0.6044 units per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1999 | 0.6036 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2000 | 0.5952 units per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2001 | 0.5855 units per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2002 | 0.5811 units per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2003 | 0.5796 units per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2004 | 0.5752 units per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2005 | 0.5681 units per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2006 | 0.5673 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2007 | 0.5727 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2008 | 0.582 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2009 | 0.5995 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2010 | 0.6273 units per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2011 | 0.6669 units per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2012 | 0.7136 units per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2013 | 0.7739 units per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2014 | 0.8487 units per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2015 | 0.9263 units per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2016 | 1.01 units per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2017 | 1.09 units per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2018 | 1.17 units per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2019 | 1.24 units per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2020 | 1.29 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2021 | 1.32 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2022 | 1.3 units per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2023 | 1.25 units per square kilometre | -4.2% |
Zimbabwe compared with similar countries
- Zimbabwe's 1.25 units per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 2.87 units per square kilometre, 43% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Zimbabwe's 1.25 units per square kilometre is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 2.24 units per square kilometre, 56% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2519 units per square kilometre | 0.2266 units per square kilometre | 0.2711 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.2994 units per square kilometre | 0.276 units per square kilometre | 0.318 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4445 units per square kilometre | 0.3214 units per square kilometre | 0.6048 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6195 units per square kilometre | 0.6021 units per square kilometre | 0.6506 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.5806 units per square kilometre | 0.5673 units per square kilometre | 0.5995 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.9063 units per square kilometre | 0.6273 units per square kilometre | 1.24 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.29 units per square kilometre | 1.25 units per square kilometre | 1.32 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 163 Faroe Islands 1.3 units per square kilometre compare
- 164 Kyrgyzstan 1.29 units per square kilometre compare
- 165 Estonia 1.27 units per square kilometre compare
- 167 Lao People's Democratic Republic 1.24 units per square kilometre compare
- 168 Saudi Arabia 1.18 units per square kilometre compare
- 169 Latvia 1.15 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Zimbabwe
- Un projection of annual infant deaths, annual growth rate -1.39 % change on previous year (2100)
- Heat deaths vs projected death rates, annual growth rate 1.11 % change on previous year (2090)
- Estimated changes in temperature-related death rates compared to projected death rates 874.6 deaths per 1,000 people (2090)
- Number of infants who die before age 1 4,457 deaths (2100)
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled 2 (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, annual growth rate 0.9632 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per capita 0.0689 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, annual growth rate 0.9673 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe?
- Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe was 1.25 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 1.32 units per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2266 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre?
- Zimbabwe ranks 166th out of 216 countries with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 61.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 35-39, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 35-39, male ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 35-39, male World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 35-39, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.