Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of
Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre was 1.98 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of is 1.98 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.4% on the previous year and up 39.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 1.98 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.2866 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Tanzania, United Republic of 145th out of 216 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2866 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.2949 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1963 | 0.3036 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1964 | 0.3127 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1965 | 0.3222 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1966 | 0.3321 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1967 | 0.3424 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1968 | 0.3535 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1969 | 0.3653 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1970 | 0.3775 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1971 | 0.3906 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1972 | 0.405 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1973 | 0.4205 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1974 | 0.4368 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1975 | 0.4542 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1976 | 0.4727 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1977 | 0.4925 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1978 | 0.5135 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1979 | 0.5355 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1980 | 0.5558 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1981 | 0.5744 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1982 | 0.5938 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1983 | 0.6187 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1984 | 0.6384 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1985 | 0.6546 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1986 | 0.6709 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1987 | 0.6852 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1988 | 0.6943 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1989 | 0.6944 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.695 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1991 | 0.6944 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1992 | 0.6928 units per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1993 | 0.7054 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1994 | 0.7357 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1995 | 0.7548 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1996 | 0.7465 units per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1997 | 0.7447 units per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1998 | 0.7614 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1999 | 0.7856 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2000 | 0.8214 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2001 | 0.8613 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2002 | 0.905 units per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2003 | 0.9545 units per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2004 | 1.01 units per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2005 | 1.06 units per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2006 | 1.12 units per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2007 | 1.18 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2008 | 1.23 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2009 | 1.27 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2010 | 1.31 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2011 | 1.35 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2012 | 1.39 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2013 | 1.43 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2014 | 1.47 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2015 | 1.51 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2016 | 1.57 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2017 | 1.63 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2018 | 1.68 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2019 | 1.74 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2020 | 1.8 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2021 | 1.86 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2022 | 1.92 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2023 | 1.98 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
Tanzania, United Republic of compared with similar countries
- Tanzania, United Republic of's 1.98 units per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 2.87 units per square kilometre, 69% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Tanzania, United Republic of's 1.98 units per square kilometre is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 2.24 units per square kilometre, 89% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3237 units per square kilometre | 0.2866 units per square kilometre | 0.3653 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.4499 units per square kilometre | 0.3775 units per square kilometre | 0.5355 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6381 units per square kilometre | 0.5558 units per square kilometre | 0.6944 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.7316 units per square kilometre | 0.6928 units per square kilometre | 0.7856 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.04 units per square kilometre | 0.8214 units per square kilometre | 1.27 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.51 units per square kilometre | 1.31 units per square kilometre | 1.74 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.89 units per square kilometre | 1.8 units per square kilometre | 1.98 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of
- 142 Panama 2.16 units per square kilometre compare
- 143 Bosnia and Herzegovina 2.09 units per square kilometre compare
- 144 Nicaragua 2.01 units per square kilometre compare
- 146 Georgia 1.94 units per square kilometre compare
- 147 Belarus 1.91 units per square kilometre compare
- 148 Samoa 1.9 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Tanzania, United Republic of
- Un projection of annual infant deaths, annual growth rate -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Heat deaths vs projected death rates, annual growth rate 0.7342 % change on previous year (2090)
- Estimated changes in temperature-related death rates compared to projected death rates 658.6 deaths per 1,000 people (2090)
- Number of infants who die before age 1 32,514 deaths (2100)
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled 13 (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, annual growth rate 1.86 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per capita 0.0786 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, annual growth rate 1.89 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of was 1.98 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 1.98 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2866 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 145th out of 216 countries with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is up 39.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 35-39, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 35-39, male ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 35-39, male World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 35-39, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.