Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of
Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre was 2.08 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
2.08 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 3.0%
World rank
142nd
of 216 countries
All-time high
2.08 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.3015 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
Tanzania, United Republic of recorded 2.08 units per square kilometre for population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.0% on the previous year and up 39.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 2.08 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.3015 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 142nd of 216 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.3015 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.3092 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1963 | 0.3173 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1964 | 0.3256 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1965 | 0.3343 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1966 | 0.3436 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1967 | 0.3535 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1968 | 0.3625 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1969 | 0.3704 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1970 | 0.3781 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1971 | 0.386 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1972 | 0.3937 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1973 | 0.4018 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1974 | 0.4107 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1975 | 0.4204 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1976 | 0.4313 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1977 | 0.4441 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1978 | 0.4606 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1979 | 0.4824 units per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1980 | 0.505 units per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1981 | 0.5273 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1982 | 0.5531 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1983 | 0.5889 units per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1984 | 0.6208 units per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1985 | 0.6519 units per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1986 | 0.6877 units per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1987 | 0.7242 units per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1988 | 0.7588 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1989 | 0.7857 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1990 | 0.8129 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1991 | 0.8361 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1992 | 0.854 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1993 | 0.873 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1994 | 0.8943 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1995 | 0.9045 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1996 | 0.8966 units per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1997 | 0.8875 units per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1998 | 0.8848 units per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1999 | 0.8857 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2000 | 0.8941 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2001 | 0.9085 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2002 | 0.9298 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2003 | 0.9591 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2004 | 0.9961 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2005 | 1.04 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2006 | 1.09 units per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2007 | 1.14 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2008 | 1.2 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2009 | 1.25 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2010 | 1.31 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2011 | 1.37 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2012 | 1.42 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2013 | 1.48 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2014 | 1.54 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2015 | 1.6 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2016 | 1.66 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2017 | 1.72 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2018 | 1.78 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2019 | 1.84 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2020 | 1.9 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2021 | 1.96 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2022 | 2.02 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2023 | 2.08 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
Tanzania, United Republic of compared with similar countries
- Tanzania, United Republic of's 2.08 units per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 2.97 units per square kilometre, 70% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Tanzania, United Republic of's 2.08 units per square kilometre is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 2.14 units per square kilometre, 97% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3353 units per square kilometre | 0.3015 units per square kilometre | 0.3704 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.4209 units per square kilometre | 0.3781 units per square kilometre | 0.4824 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6403 units per square kilometre | 0.505 units per square kilometre | 0.7857 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.8729 units per square kilometre | 0.8129 units per square kilometre | 0.9045 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.04 units per square kilometre | 0.8941 units per square kilometre | 1.25 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.57 units per square kilometre | 1.31 units per square kilometre | 1.84 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.99 units per square kilometre | 1.9 units per square kilometre | 2.08 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of
- 139 Nicaragua 2.15 units per square kilometre compare
- 140 Panama 2.13 units per square kilometre compare
- 141 Samoa 2.1 units per square kilometre compare
- 143 Equatorial Guinea 2.04 units per square kilometre compare
- 144 Georgia 2.04 units per square kilometre compare
- 145 Bulgaria 2.04 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Tanzania, United Republic of
- Un projection of annual infant deaths, annual growth rate -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Heat deaths vs projected death rates, annual growth rate 0.7342 % change on previous year (2090)
- Estimated changes in temperature-related death rates compared to projected death rates 658.6 deaths per 1,000 people (2090)
- Number of infants who die before age 1 32,514 deaths (2100)
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled 13 (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, annual growth rate 1.86 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per capita 0.0786 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, annual growth rate 1.89 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of was 2.08 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 2.08 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3015 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 142nd out of 216 countries with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is up 39.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 35-39, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 35-39, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 35-39, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 35-39, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.