Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre was 1.31 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) is 1.31 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 3.6% on the previous year and up 42.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) peaked at 1.31 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.2841 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) 32nd out of 43 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2841 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.2901 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1963 | 0.2963 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1964 | 0.3027 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1965 | 0.3093 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1966 | 0.3161 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1967 | 0.3231 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1968 | 0.3303 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1969 | 0.3374 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1970 | 0.3445 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1971 | 0.3518 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1972 | 0.3591 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1973 | 0.3666 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1974 | 0.3743 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1975 | 0.382 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1976 | 0.3897 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1977 | 0.397 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1978 | 0.4054 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1979 | 0.4151 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1980 | 0.4241 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1981 | 0.4332 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1982 | 0.4443 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1983 | 0.4565 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1984 | 0.4684 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1985 | 0.4806 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1986 | 0.4933 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1987 | 0.5068 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1988 | 0.5219 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1989 | 0.5383 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1990 | 0.5545 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1991 | 0.5707 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1992 | 0.5888 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1993 | 0.57 units per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1994 | 0.589 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1995 | 0.6079 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1996 | 0.6258 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1997 | 0.6435 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1998 | 0.6626 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1999 | 0.682 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2000 | 0.7004 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2001 | 0.719 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2002 | 0.7394 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2003 | 0.7611 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2004 | 0.7768 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2005 | 0.8003 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2006 | 0.8246 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2007 | 0.8488 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2008 | 0.8736 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2009 | 0.8996 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2010 | 0.926 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2011 | 0.9537 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2012 | 0.8888 units per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 2013 | 0.9183 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2014 | 0.9515 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2015 | 0.9866 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2016 | 1.02 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2017 | 1.06 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2018 | 1.1 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2019 | 1.14 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2020 | 1.18 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2021 | 1.22 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2022 | 1.26 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2023 | 1.31 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3099 units per square kilometre | 0.2841 units per square kilometre | 0.3374 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.3785 units per square kilometre | 0.3445 units per square kilometre | 0.4151 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4767 units per square kilometre | 0.4241 units per square kilometre | 0.5383 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6095 units per square kilometre | 0.5545 units per square kilometre | 0.682 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.7943 units per square kilometre | 0.7004 units per square kilometre | 0.8996 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.995 units per square kilometre | 0.8888 units per square kilometre | 1.14 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.24 units per square kilometre | 1.18 units per square kilometre | 1.31 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- 29 Israel 14.23 units per square kilometre compare
- 30 Comoros 14.15 units per square kilometre compare
- 31 British Virgin Islands 13.77 units per square kilometre compare
- 32 Viet Nam 13.5 units per square kilometre compare
- 33 Philippines 13.18 units per square kilometre compare
- 34 Sri Lanka 12.54 units per square kilometre compare
- 35 Belgium 12.47 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Population ages 35-39, female, annual growth rate 3.5 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per capita 0.023 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, annual growth rate 3.54 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per capita 0.0275 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, annual growth rate 3.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, female, per capita 0.0282 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 25-29, male, per capita 0.04 units per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) was 1.31 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The highest recorded value was 1.31 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2841 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank for population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 32nd out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 42.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 35-39, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 35-39, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 35-39, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 35-39, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.