Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Ecuador
Ecuador: Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre was 2.68 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
2.68 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 1.2%
World rank
126th
of 216 countries
All-time high
2.68 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.4193 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Ecuador stood at 2.68 units per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 1.2% on the previous year and up 25.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Ecuador peaked at 2.68 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.4193 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Ecuador ranks 126th of 216 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.4193 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.4314 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1963 | 0.4442 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1964 | 0.4573 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1965 | 0.4705 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1966 | 0.4839 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1967 | 0.4977 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1968 | 0.5116 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1969 | 0.5257 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1970 | 0.5401 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1971 | 0.5547 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1972 | 0.5694 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1973 | 0.5848 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1974 | 0.6022 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1975 | 0.6216 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1976 | 0.6429 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1977 | 0.6664 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1978 | 0.6922 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1979 | 0.7194 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1980 | 0.7474 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1981 | 0.7755 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1982 | 0.8046 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1983 | 0.8392 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1984 | 0.8813 units per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1985 | 0.9256 units per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1986 | 0.9701 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1987 | 1.01 units per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1988 | 1.05 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1989 | 1.08 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1990 | 1.11 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1991 | 1.14 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1992 | 1.17 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1993 | 1.2 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1994 | 1.23 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1995 | 1.27 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1996 | 1.3 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1997 | 1.33 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1998 | 1.52 units per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1999 | 1.56 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2000 | 1.59 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2001 | 1.63 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2002 | 1.67 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2003 | 1.71 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2004 | 1.75 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2005 | 1.8 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2006 | 1.84 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2007 | 1.88 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2008 | 1.92 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2009 | 1.97 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2010 | 2.01 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2011 | 2.05 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2012 | 2.1 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2013 | 2.14 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2014 | 2.19 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2015 | 2.24 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2016 | 2.3 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2017 | 2.36 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2018 | 2.43 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2019 | 2.51 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2020 | 2.57 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2021 | 2.61 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2022 | 2.65 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2023 | 2.68 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 2.68 units per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3 units per square kilometre, 89% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 2.68 units per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 3.76 units per square kilometre, 71% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4713 units per square kilometre | 0.4193 units per square kilometre | 0.5257 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.6194 units per square kilometre | 0.5401 units per square kilometre | 0.7194 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.9096 units per square kilometre | 0.7474 units per square kilometre | 1.08 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.28 units per square kilometre | 1.11 units per square kilometre | 1.56 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.78 units per square kilometre | 1.59 units per square kilometre | 1.97 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.24 units per square kilometre | 2.01 units per square kilometre | 2.51 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.63 units per square kilometre | 2.57 units per square kilometre | 2.68 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 123 Senegal 2.74 units per square kilometre compare
- 124 Ireland 2.74 units per square kilometre compare
- 125 Romania 2.73 units per square kilometre compare
- 127 Serbia 2.68 units per square kilometre compare
- 128 Tajikistan 2.64 units per square kilometre compare
- 129 Eswatini 2.57 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Ecuador
- Un projection of annual infant deaths, annual growth rate -1.67 % change on previous year (2100)
- Heat deaths vs projected death rates, annual growth rate 0.6766 % change on previous year (2090)
- Estimated changes in temperature-related death rates compared to projected death rates 1,324 deaths per 1,000 people (2090)
- Number of infants who die before age 1 354 deaths (2100)
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled 0 (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, annual growth rate -1.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per capita 0.0362 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, annual growth rate -1.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Ecuador?
- Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre in Ecuador was 2.68 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 2.68 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4193 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Ecuador rank for population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 126th out of 216 countries with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 35-39, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 35-39, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 35-39, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 35-39, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.