Population ages 25-29, female, per unit of GDP in IDA & IBRD total
IDA & IBRD total: Population ages 25-29, female, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Population ages 25-29, female, per unit of GDP in IDA & IBRD total, 1960–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 25-29, female, per unit of gdp in IDA & IBRD total is 0 units per US$ of GDP, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 66 years on record.
The figure is down 5.2% on the previous year and down 40.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 25-29, female, per unit of gdp in IDA & IBRD total peaked at 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
That places IDA & IBRD total 19th out of 43 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 25-29, female, per unit of GDP in IDA & IBRD total, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 1962 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 1963 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
| 1964 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 1965 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 1966 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1967 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 1968 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 1969 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 1970 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 1971 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 1972 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -8.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -18.6% |
| 1974 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 1975 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 1976 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 1977 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 1978 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 1979 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 1980 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 1981 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 1982 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +4.8% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +5.6% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1986 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 1987 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 1988 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 1989 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.7% |
| 1990 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.2% |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +4.8% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +5.8% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.4% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.0% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.3% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.3% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.7% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +5.1% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.8% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.5% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.9% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.7% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near IDA & IBRD total
- 16 Lesotho 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 17 Chad 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 18 Syrian Arab Republic 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 19 Guinea-Bissau 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 20 Uganda 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 21 Sudan 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 22 Rwanda 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
More health data for IDA & IBRD total
- Population ages 45-49, female, per capita 0.0286 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, male, annual growth rate 0.3064 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, female, per capita 0.0274 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, female, annual growth rate 0.2951 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 45-49, male, per capita 0.0288 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 45-49, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 45-49, male, annual growth rate 1.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, male, annual growth rate 2.28 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 25-29, female, per unit of gdp in IDA & IBRD total?
- Population ages 25-29, female, per unit of gdp in IDA & IBRD total was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 25-29, female, per unit of gdp recorded in IDA & IBRD total?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP in 1960.
- What is the lowest population ages 25-29, female, per unit of gdp recorded in IDA & IBRD total?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does IDA & IBRD total rank for population ages 25-29, female, per unit of gdp?
- IDA & IBRD total ranks 19th out of 43 groups with data for 2025.
- Is population ages 25-29, female, per unit of gdp rising or falling in IDA & IBRD total?
- Over the last ten years it is down 40.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this IDA & IBRD total data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 25-29, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 66 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 25-29, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 25-29, female ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population ages 25-29, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 25-29, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.