Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre was 2.33 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
2.33 units per square kilometre
Change on year
down 1.7%
Rank
18th
of 43 groups
All-time high
2.77 units per square kilometre
in 2016
All-time low
1.14 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income is 2.33 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 1.7% on the previous year and down 12.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income peaked at 2.77 units per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 1.14 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Upper middle income 18th out of 43 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.14 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 1.15 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1963 | 1.16 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1964 | 1.17 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1965 | 1.17 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1966 | 1.18 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1967 | 1.18 units per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1968 | 1.19 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1969 | 1.2 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1970 | 1.21 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1971 | 1.24 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1972 | 1.28 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1973 | 1.33 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1974 | 1.41 units per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1975 | 1.5 units per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1976 | 1.59 units per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1977 | 1.69 units per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1978 | 1.79 units per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1979 | 1.88 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1980 | 1.96 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1981 | 2.02 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1982 | 2.07 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1983 | 2.11 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1984 | 2.1 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1985 | 2.07 units per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1986 | 2.04 units per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1987 | 2.04 units per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1988 | 2.14 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1989 | 2.29 units per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1990 | 2.45 units per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1991 | 2.6 units per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1992 | 2.44 units per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1993 | 2.45 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1994 | 2.47 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1995 | 2.51 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1996 | 2.55 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1997 | 2.58 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1998 | 2.6 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1999 | 2.58 units per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2000 | 2.54 units per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2001 | 2.49 units per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2002 | 2.44 units per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2003 | 2.39 units per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2004 | 2.36 units per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2005 | 2.36 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2.38 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2007 | 2.42 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2008 | 2.47 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2009 | 2.51 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2010 | 2.55 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2011 | 2.59 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2012 | 2.63 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2013 | 2.68 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2014 | 2.72 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2015 | 2.77 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2016 | 2.77 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2017 | 2.72 units per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2018 | 2.66 units per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2019 | 2.58 units per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2020 | 2.49 units per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2021 | 2.42 units per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2022 | 2.37 units per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2023 | 2.33 units per square kilometre | -1.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.17 units per square kilometre | 1.14 units per square kilometre | 1.2 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.49 units per square kilometre | 1.21 units per square kilometre | 1.88 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.09 units per square kilometre | 1.96 units per square kilometre | 2.29 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.52 units per square kilometre | 2.44 units per square kilometre | 2.6 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.44 units per square kilometre | 2.36 units per square kilometre | 2.54 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.67 units per square kilometre | 2.55 units per square kilometre | 2.77 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.4 units per square kilometre | 2.33 units per square kilometre | 2.49 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 15 Rwanda 21.91 units per square kilometre compare
- 16 Naoero 21.1 units per square kilometre compare
- 17 Barbados 20.81 units per square kilometre compare
- 18 Lebanon 20.5 units per square kilometre compare
- 19 India 19.8 units per square kilometre compare
- 20 Haiti 18.5 units per square kilometre compare
- 21 Burundi 17.78 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Upper middle income
- Population ages 45-49, female, per capita 0.0325 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, female, per capita 0.0344 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 10-14, male, annual growth rate 0.256 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, female, annual growth rate -1.53 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 45-49, male, per capita 0.0327 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 45-49, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 10-14, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 45-49, male, annual growth rate 0.3107 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 15-19, female, annual growth rate 1.31 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income?
- Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre in Upper middle income was 2.33 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 2.77 units per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.14 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Upper middle income rank for population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre?
- Upper middle income ranks 18th out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 12.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 25-29, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 25-29, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 25-29, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 25-29, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.