Population ages 15-64, total, per unit of GDP in Post-demographic dividend
Post-demographic dividend: Population ages 15-64, total, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Population ages 15-64, total, per unit of GDP in Post-demographic dividend, 1960–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Post-demographic dividend recorded 0 units per US$ of GDP for population ages 15-64, total, per unit of gdp in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 66 years on record.
The figure is down 5.5% on the previous year and down 33.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 15-64, total, per unit of gdp in Post-demographic dividend peaked at 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
Post-demographic dividend ranks 44th of 45 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 15-64, total, per unit of GDP in Post-demographic dividend, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 1962 | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1963 | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 1964 | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | -7.3% |
| 1965 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 1967 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 1968 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 1969 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 1970 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
| 1971 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 1972 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 1973 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -16.4% |
| 1974 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 1975 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -9.8% |
| 1976 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1977 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 1978 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -16.1% |
| 1979 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -12.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 1981 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +1.6% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 1986 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -17.6% |
| 1987 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.1% |
| 1988 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 1989 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 1990 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.6% |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.6% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.8% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.2% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.1% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +5.7% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.8% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Post-demographic dividend
- 41 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 42 Kenya 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 43 India 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 44 Bangladesh 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 45 Mauritania 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 46 Kiribati 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 47 Haiti 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP compare
More health data for Post-demographic dividend
- Population ages 70-74, male, per capita 0.0239 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 80 and above, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 0-14, total, annual growth rate -0.9867 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, male, per capita 0.0197 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, male, annual growth rate 4.78 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, female, per capita 0.024 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 75-79, female, annual growth rate 4.78 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 65-69, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 15-64, total, per unit of gdp in Post-demographic dividend?
- Population ages 15-64, total, per unit of gdp in Post-demographic dividend was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 15-64, total, per unit of gdp recorded in Post-demographic dividend?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP in 1960.
- What is the lowest population ages 15-64, total, per unit of gdp recorded in Post-demographic dividend?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does Post-demographic dividend rank for population ages 15-64, total, per unit of gdp?
- Post-demographic dividend ranks 44th out of 45 groups with data for 2025.
- Is population ages 15-64, total, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Post-demographic dividend?
- Over the last ten years it is down 33.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Post-demographic dividend data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 15-64, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 66 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 15-64, total divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 15-64, total ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population ages 15-64, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN), publisher: UN Population Division
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 15-64, total divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.