Population ages 15-64, female, per unit of GDP in Post-demographic dividend
Post-demographic dividend: Population ages 15-64, female, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Population ages 15-64, female, per unit of GDP in Post-demographic dividend, 1960–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2025, population ages 15-64, female, per unit of gdp in Post-demographic dividend stood at 0 units per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 66 years on record.
That represents a change of down 5.6% on the previous year and down 33.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 15-64, female, per unit of gdp in Post-demographic dividend peaked at 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
Post-demographic dividend ranks 44th of 45 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 15-64, female, per unit of GDP in Post-demographic dividend, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 1962 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 1963 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 1965 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 1966 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 1967 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 1968 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 1970 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -8.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 1972 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -13.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -16.5% |
| 1974 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
| 1976 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 1977 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 1978 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.3% |
| 1979 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 1980 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 1981 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 1982 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
| 1983 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 1984 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 1985 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1986 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.7% |
| 1987 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.3% |
| 1988 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 1989 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 1990 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.1% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.6% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.8% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.1% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.2% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.1% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +5.6% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.7% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Post-demographic dividend
- 41 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 42 Bangladesh 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 43 Kenya 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 44 Mauritania 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 45 Kiribati 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 46 India 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 47 Haiti 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
More health data for Post-demographic dividend
- Population ages 50-54, female, per capita 0.0339 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 55-59, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 55-59, female, annual growth rate -0.0187 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, male, per capita 0.0338 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, male, annual growth rate -0.8967 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, female, annual growth rate -0.9546 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 45-49, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 45-49, male, per capita 0.0331 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 55-59, female, per capita 0.0341 units per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 15-64, female, per unit of gdp in Post-demographic dividend?
- Population ages 15-64, female, per unit of gdp in Post-demographic dividend was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 15-64, female, per unit of gdp recorded in Post-demographic dividend?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP in 1960.
- What is the lowest population ages 15-64, female, per unit of gdp recorded in Post-demographic dividend?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does Post-demographic dividend rank for population ages 15-64, female, per unit of gdp?
- Post-demographic dividend ranks 44th out of 45 groups with data for 2025.
- Is population ages 15-64, female, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Post-demographic dividend?
- Over the last ten years it is down 33.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Post-demographic dividend data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 15-64, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 66 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 15-64, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 15-64, female ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population ages 15-64, female World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN), publisher: UN Population Division
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 15-64, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.