Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre in Costa Rica

Costa Rica: Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre was 3.3 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
3.3 units per square kilometre
Change on year
down 0.9%
World rank
123rd
of 216 countries
All-time high
3.97 units per square kilometre
in 1996
All-time low
2.02 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1961–2023

01234196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2023, population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre in Costa Rica stood at 3.3 units per square kilometre.

That represents a change of down 0.9% on the previous year and down 4.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre in Costa Rica peaked at 3.97 units per square kilometre in 1996 and was at its lowest, 2.02 units per square kilometre, in 1961.

Costa Rica ranks 123rd of 216 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.

Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, year by year

Annual values for Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1961 to 2023.
Year units per square kilometre Change
1961 2.02 units per square kilometre
1962 2.11 units per square kilometre +4.2%
1963 2.2 units per square kilometre +4.3%
1964 2.29 units per square kilometre +4.3%
1965 2.39 units per square kilometre +4.2%
1966 2.48 units per square kilometre +3.9%
1967 2.56 units per square kilometre +3.4%
1968 2.64 units per square kilometre +2.8%
1969 2.69 units per square kilometre +2.1%
1970 2.73 units per square kilometre +1.5%
1971 2.76 units per square kilometre +0.9%
1972 2.77 units per square kilometre +0.3%
1973 2.76 units per square kilometre -0.3%
1974 2.74 units per square kilometre -0.6%
1975 2.72 units per square kilometre -0.6%
1976 2.71 units per square kilometre -0.6%
1977 2.7 units per square kilometre -0.4%
1978 2.7 units per square kilometre +0.0%
1979 2.71 units per square kilometre +0.6%
1980 2.74 units per square kilometre +1.1%
1981 2.79 units per square kilometre +1.7%
1982 2.85 units per square kilometre +2.4%
1983 2.94 units per square kilometre +3.0%
1984 3.04 units per square kilometre +3.4%
1985 3.14 units per square kilometre +3.4%
1986 3.25 units per square kilometre +3.3%
1987 3.35 units per square kilometre +3.2%
1988 3.45 units per square kilometre +3.1%
1989 3.56 units per square kilometre +2.9%
1990 3.66 units per square kilometre +2.9%
1991 3.76 units per square kilometre +2.7%
1992 3.84 units per square kilometre +2.2%
1993 3.9 units per square kilometre +1.7%
1994 3.94 units per square kilometre +1.1%
1995 3.96 units per square kilometre +0.5%
1996 3.97 units per square kilometre +0.0%
1997 3.96 units per square kilometre -0.2%
1998 3.95 units per square kilometre -0.3%
1999 3.94 units per square kilometre -0.3%
2000 3.92 units per square kilometre -0.3%
2001 3.91 units per square kilometre -0.4%
2002 3.89 units per square kilometre -0.5%
2003 3.86 units per square kilometre -0.6%
2004 3.84 units per square kilometre -0.6%
2005 3.82 units per square kilometre -0.5%
2006 3.8 units per square kilometre -0.7%
2007 3.75 units per square kilometre -1.2%
2008 3.69 units per square kilometre -1.7%
2009 3.62 units per square kilometre -2.0%
2010 3.55 units per square kilometre -1.9%
2011 3.49 units per square kilometre -1.7%
2012 3.45 units per square kilometre -1.1%
2013 3.45 units per square kilometre +0.1%
2014 3.47 units per square kilometre +0.6%
2015 3.47 units per square kilometre -0.2%
2016 3.46 units per square kilometre -0.3%
2017 3.46 units per square kilometre +0.1%
2018 3.43 units per square kilometre -0.8%
2019 3.39 units per square kilometre -1.2%
2020 3.38 units per square kilometre -0.4%
2021 3.37 units per square kilometre -0.4%
2022 3.33 units per square kilometre -1.1%
2023 3.3 units per square kilometre -0.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 2.38 units per square kilometre 2.02 units per square kilometre 2.69 units per square kilometre 9
1970s 2.73 units per square kilometre 2.7 units per square kilometre 2.77 units per square kilometre 10
1980s 3.11 units per square kilometre 2.74 units per square kilometre 3.56 units per square kilometre 10
1990s 3.89 units per square kilometre 3.66 units per square kilometre 3.97 units per square kilometre 10
2000s 3.81 units per square kilometre 3.62 units per square kilometre 3.92 units per square kilometre 10
2010s 3.46 units per square kilometre 3.39 units per square kilometre 3.55 units per square kilometre 10
2020s 3.34 units per square kilometre 3.3 units per square kilometre 3.38 units per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Costa Rica

  1. 120 Northern Mariana Islands 3.35 units per square kilometre compare
  2. 121 Tunisia 3.33 units per square kilometre compare
  3. 122 Myanmar 3.33 units per square kilometre compare
  4. 124 Mozambique 3.15 units per square kilometre compare
  5. 125 Brunei Darussalam 3.02 units per square kilometre compare
  6. 126 Poland 2.96 units per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 260 places →

More health data for Costa Rica

All data for Costa Rica →

Frequently asked questions

What is population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre in Costa Rica?
Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre in Costa Rica was 3.3 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
The highest recorded value was 3.97 units per square kilometre in 1996.
What is the lowest population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
The lowest recorded value was 2.02 units per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Costa Rica rank for population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 123rd out of 216 countries with data for 2023.
Is population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Costa Rica?
Over the last ten years it is down 4.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre in Costa Rica. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/stat/population-ages-05-09-female-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/stat/population-ages-05-09-female-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/">Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre in Costa Rica</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Population ages 05-09, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Population ages 05-09, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 05-09, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.