Population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income
Lower middle income: Population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre was 7.51 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
7.51 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 0.1%
Rank
3rd
of 43 groups
All-time high
7.57 units per square kilometre
in 2016
All-time low
3.57 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income is 7.51 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.1% on the previous year and down 0.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income peaked at 7.57 units per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 3.57 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Lower middle income ranks 3rd of 43 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 3.57 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 3.65 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1963 | 3.74 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1964 | 3.83 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1965 | 3.92 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1966 | 4 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1967 | 4.07 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1968 | 4.15 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1969 | 4.24 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1970 | 4.32 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1971 | 4.41 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1972 | 4.5 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1973 | 4.6 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1974 | 4.71 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1975 | 4.82 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1976 | 4.92 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1977 | 5.03 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1978 | 5.13 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1979 | 5.24 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1980 | 5.36 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1981 | 5.49 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1982 | 5.62 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1983 | 5.76 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1984 | 5.89 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1985 | 6.03 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1986 | 6.15 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1987 | 6.26 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1988 | 6.37 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1989 | 6.46 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1990 | 6.55 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1991 | 6.62 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1992 | 6.42 units per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1993 | 6.47 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1994 | 6.53 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1995 | 6.58 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1996 | 6.63 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1997 | 6.69 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1998 | 6.74 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1999 | 6.81 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2000 | 6.87 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2001 | 6.95 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2002 | 7.03 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2003 | 7.1 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2004 | 7.17 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2005 | 7.21 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2006 | 7.24 units per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2007 | 7.27 units per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2008 | 7.3 units per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2009 | 7.34 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2010 | 7.39 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2011 | 7.44 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2012 | 7.5 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2013 | 7.54 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2014 | 7.56 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2015 | 7.57 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2016 | 7.57 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2017 | 7.57 units per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2018 | 7.56 units per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2019 | 7.55 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2020 | 7.54 units per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2021 | 7.52 units per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2022 | 7.51 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2023 | 7.51 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.91 units per square kilometre | 3.57 units per square kilometre | 4.24 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 4.77 units per square kilometre | 4.32 units per square kilometre | 5.24 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.94 units per square kilometre | 5.36 units per square kilometre | 6.46 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 6.6 units per square kilometre | 6.42 units per square kilometre | 6.81 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 7.15 units per square kilometre | 6.87 units per square kilometre | 7.34 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.53 units per square kilometre | 7.39 units per square kilometre | 7.57 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 7.52 units per square kilometre | 7.51 units per square kilometre | 7.54 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Lower middle income
- 1 Monaco 425.62 units per square kilometre compare
- 2 Macau, China 413.73 units per square kilometre compare
- 3 Singapore 159.8 units per square kilometre compare
- 4 Gibraltar 108.9 units per square kilometre compare
- 5 Hong Kong, China 105.26 units per square kilometre compare
- 6 Bangladesh 61.96 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Lower middle income
- Population ages 40-44, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, annual growth rate 1.33 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per capita 0.0359 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, annual growth rate 2.83 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, male, annual growth rate 2.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, male, per capita 0.0321 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, female, per capita 0.0347 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per capita 0.031 units per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income?
- Population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income was 7.51 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre recorded in Lower middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 7.57 units per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre recorded in Lower middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.57 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Lower middle income rank for population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre?
- Lower middle income ranks 3rd out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Lower middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Lower middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 00-04, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 00-04, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 00-04, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 00-04, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.