Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre in Brazil
Brazil: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre was 0 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0 units per square kilometre
World rank
67th
of 204 countries
All-time high
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 1983
All-time low
0 units per square kilometre
in 1978
Years of data
46
1978–2023
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre in Brazil, 1978–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
Brazil recorded 0 units per square kilometre for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 46 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre in Brazil peaked at 0.0001 units per square kilometre in 1983 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1978.
Brazil ranks 67th of 204 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre in Brazil, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1978 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1986 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 1987 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1988 | 0 units per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 1989 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 1990 | 0 units per square kilometre | -24.0% |
| 1991 | 0 units per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1992 | 0 units per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 1993 | 0 units per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1994 | 0 units per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 1995 | 0 units per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 1996 | 0 units per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 1997 | 0 units per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 1998 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 1999 | 0 units per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2000 | 0 units per square kilometre | -48.5% |
| 2001 | 0 units per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 2002 | 0 units per square kilometre | +82.4% |
| 2003 | 0 units per square kilometre | -51.6% |
| 2004 | 0 units per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2005 | 0 units per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 2006 | 0 units per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 2007 | 0 units per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 2008 | 0 units per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 2009 | 0 units per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 2010 | 0 units per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2011 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0 units per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2013 | 0 units per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 2014 | 0 units per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2015 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2016 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2017 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2018 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2019 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2020 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2021 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2022 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2023 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 2 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 64 Peru 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 65 Iran 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 66 Mexico 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Aruba 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Albania 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Andorra 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 United Arab Emirates 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Argentina 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Armenia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 American Samoa 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Antigua and Barbuda 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Australia 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Austria 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Azerbaijan 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Belgium 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Bulgaria 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Bahrain 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Bahamas 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Belarus 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Belize 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Bermuda 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Bolivia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Barbados 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Brunei 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Bhutan 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Botswana 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Canada 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Chile 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Colombia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Cape Verde 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Costa Rica 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Cuba 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Cayman Islands 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Cyprus 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Czechia 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Germany 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Dominica 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Denmark 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Algeria 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Ecuador 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Eritrea 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Spain 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Estonia 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Finland 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 France 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Micronesia (country) 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 United Kingdom 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Georgia 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Gambia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Guinea-Bissau 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Greece 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Grenada 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Guatemala 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Guam 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Guyana 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Hong Kong 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Croatia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Hungary 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Ireland 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Iceland 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Israel 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Italy 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Jamaica 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Jordan 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Japan 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Kazakhstan 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Kyrgyzstan 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Kiribati 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 South Korea 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Kuwait 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Lebanon 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Libya 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Saint Lucia 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Sri Lanka 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Lesotho 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Lithuania 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Luxembourg 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Latvia 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Macao 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Monaco 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Moldova 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Maldives 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Marshall Islands 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 North Macedonia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Malta 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Montenegro 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Mongolia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Northern Mariana Islands 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Mauritius 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 New Caledonia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Nicaragua 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Netherlands 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Norway 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Nepal 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Nauru 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 New Zealand 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Oman 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Panama 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Palau 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Poland 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 North Korea 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Portugal 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Paraguay 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Palestine 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 French Polynesia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Qatar 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Romania 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Russia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Senegal 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Singapore 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 El Salvador 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 San Marino 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Serbia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Sao Tome and Principe 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Slovakia 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Slovenia 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Sweden 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Eswatini 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Seychelles 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Thailand 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Tajikistan 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Turkmenistan 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 East Timor 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Tonga 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Trinidad and Tobago 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Tunisia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Turkey 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Tuvalu 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Ukraine 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Uruguay 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 United States 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Uzbekistan 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 British Virgin Islands 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Vanuatu 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 67 Samoa 0 units per square kilometre
- 67 Zimbabwe 0 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Brazil
- Un projection of annual infant deaths, annual growth rate -1.86 % change on previous year (2100)
- Heat deaths vs projected death rates, annual growth rate 0.1539 % change on previous year (2090)
- Estimated changes in temperature-related death rates compared to projected death rates 1,496 deaths per 1,000 people (2090)
- Number of infants who die before age 1 3,476 deaths (2100)
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled 0 (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, annual growth rate -1.66 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per capita 0.0296 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, annual growth rate -1.63 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre in Brazil?
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre in Brazil was 0 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0001 units per square kilometre in 1983.
- What is the lowest neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1978.
- How does Brazil rank for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre?
- Brazil ranks 67th out of 204 countries with data for 2023.
- Is neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 46 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.