Western Pacific (WHO regions) vs Zimbabwe: Weight-for-height <-2 SD
Western Pacific (WHO regions)
1.9
in 2024
Zimbabwe
5.1
in 2024
Western Pacific (WHO regions) rank
38th
Zimbabwe rank
40th
Weight-for-height <-2 SD over time
- Western Pacific (WHO regions)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 5.1 against 1.9 in Western Pacific (WHO regions), a difference of 3.2.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.7 times Western Pacific (WHO regions)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Western Pacific (WHO regions) ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 40th of 56 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Western Pacific (WHO regions) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.95 | 4.83 | 1.88 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 2.44 | 3.09 | 0.6519 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1.9 | 5.1 | 3.2 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher weight-for-height <-2 sd, Western Pacific (WHO regions) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 5.1 against 1.9 in Western Pacific (WHO regions) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in weight-for-height <-2 sd between Western Pacific (WHO regions) and Zimbabwe?
- 3.2, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Western Pacific (WHO regions) and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Western Pacific (WHO regions) and Zimbabwe rank globally for weight-for-height <-2 sd?
- Western Pacific (WHO regions) ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 40th of 56 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Weight-for-height <-2 SD (wasting). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.