Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Tanzania: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate

Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
72.0%
in 2023
Tanzania
96.0%
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
7th
Tanzania rank
7th

Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Tanzania
020406080100200020112023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 96.0% against 72.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 24.0%.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 7th and Tanzania ranks 7th of 16 groups.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 52.6% 83.4% 30.8% Tanzania
2010s 68.6% 92.8% 24.2% Tanzania
2020s 59.0% 70.8% 11.7% Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vitamin a supplementation coverage rate, Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 96.0% against 72.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2023.
What is the difference in vitamin a supplementation coverage rate between Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) and Tanzania?
24.0%, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) and Tanzania?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) and Tanzania rank globally for vitamin a supplementation coverage rate?
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 7th and Tanzania ranks 7th of 16 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Tanzania: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/vitamin-a-supplementation-coverage-rate-percent-of-children-ages-6-59-months/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/vitamin-a-supplementation-coverage-rate-percent-of-children-ages-6-59-months/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/tanzania/">Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Tanzania: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months)
Unit
% of children ages 6-59 months
Source
UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
79 places, 1,594 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate refers to the percentage of children ages 6-59 months old receiving two high-dose vitamin A supplements in a calendar year.