Namibia vs East Timor: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages) … 6-59
Namibia
58.0%
in 2023
East Timor
65.0%
in 2020
Namibia rank
31st
East Timor rank
29th
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages) … 6-59 over time
- Namibia
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 65.0% against 58.0% in Namibia, a difference of 7.0%.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was East Timor ahead.
Namibia ranks 31st and East Timor ranks 29th of 63 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.5% | 34.8% | 29.2% | East Timor |
| 2010s | 32.4% | 58.9% | 26.5% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vitamin a supplementation coverage rate, Namibia or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 65.0% against 58.0% in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in vitamin a supplementation coverage rate between Namibia and East Timor?
- 7.0%, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and East Timor?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and East Timor rank globally for vitamin a supplementation coverage rate?
- Namibia ranks 31st and East Timor ranks 29th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate refers to the percentage of children ages 6-59 months old receiving two high-dose vitamin A supplements in a calendar year.