Low income vs Rwanda: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate
Low income
69.5%
in 2023
Rwanda
93.0%
in 2021
Low income rank
11th
Rwanda rank
10th
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate over time
- Low income
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 93.0% against 69.5% in Low income, a difference of 23.5%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.3 times Low income's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Low income ahead.
Low income ranks 11th and Rwanda ranks 10th of 16 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Low income averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.0% | 54.6% | 1.3% | Low income |
| 2010s | 70.5% | 68.9% | 1.6% | Low income |
| 2020s | 55.0% | 93.0% | 38.0% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vitamin a supplementation coverage rate, Low income or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 93.0% against 69.5% in Low income as of 2021.
- What is the difference in vitamin a supplementation coverage rate between Low income and Rwanda?
- 23.5%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Rwanda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Low income and Rwanda rank globally for vitamin a supplementation coverage rate?
- Low income ranks 11th and Rwanda ranks 10th of 16 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate refers to the percentage of children ages 6-59 months old receiving two high-dose vitamin A supplements in a calendar year.