Low income vs Mozambique: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate
Low income
69.5%
in 2023
Mozambique
90.0%
in 2023
Low income rank
11th
Mozambique rank
14th
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate over time
- Low income
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 90.0% against 69.5% in Low income, a difference of 20.5%.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.3 times Low income's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Low income ahead.
Low income ranks 11th and Mozambique ranks 14th of 16 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Low income averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.0% | 34.0% | 25.0% | Low income |
| 2010s | 68.5% | 75.2% | 6.7% | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 55.7% | 76.0% | 20.3% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vitamin a supplementation coverage rate, Low income or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 90.0% against 69.5% in Low income as of 2023.
- What is the difference in vitamin a supplementation coverage rate between Low income and Mozambique?
- 20.5%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Mozambique?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Low income and Mozambique rank globally for vitamin a supplementation coverage rate?
- Low income ranks 11th and Mozambique ranks 14th of 16 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate refers to the percentage of children ages 6-59 months old receiving two high-dose vitamin A supplements in a calendar year.