Least developed countries vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate

Least developed countries
74.3%
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
96.0%
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
5th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
7th

Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020406080100200020112023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 96.0% against 74.3% in Least developed countries, a difference of 21.7%.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.3 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Least developed countries ahead.

Least developed countries ranks 5th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 7th of 16 groups.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 67.7% 83.4% 15.7% Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 68.3% 92.8% 24.5% Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 60.0% 70.8% 10.8% Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vitamin a supplementation coverage rate, Least developed countries or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 96.0% against 74.3% in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in vitamin a supplementation coverage rate between Least developed countries and Tanzania, United Republic of?
21.7%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Tanzania, United Republic of?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Least developed countries and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for vitamin a supplementation coverage rate?
Least developed countries ranks 5th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 7th of 16 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/vitamin-a-supplementation-coverage-rate-percent-of-children-ages-6-59-months/least-developed-countries-un-classification/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/vitamin-a-supplementation-coverage-rate-percent-of-children-ages-6-59-months/least-developed-countries-un-classification/tanzania/">Least developed countries vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months)
Unit
% of children ages 6-59 months
Source
UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
79 places, 1,594 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate refers to the percentage of children ages 6-59 months old receiving two high-dose vitamin A supplements in a calendar year.