Laos vs Zimbabwe: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages) … 6-59
Laos
36.0%
in 2022
Zimbabwe
37.0%
in 2023
Laos rank
40th
Zimbabwe rank
38th
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages) … 6-59 over time
- Laos
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 37.0% against 36.0% in Laos, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Laos ahead.
Laos ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 63 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.1% | 43.4% | 22.8% | Laos |
| 2010s | 73.4% | 44.4% | 29.0% | Laos |
| 2020s | 41.3% | 37.7% | 3.7% | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vitamin a supplementation coverage rate, Laos or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 37.0% against 36.0% in Laos as of 2023.
- What is the difference in vitamin a supplementation coverage rate between Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 1.0%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Laos and Zimbabwe rank globally for vitamin a supplementation coverage rate?
- Laos ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate refers to the percentage of children ages 6-59 months old receiving two high-dose vitamin A supplements in a calendar year.