Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate
Kiribati
37.0%
in 2017
Zimbabwe
37.0%
in 2023
Kiribati rank
38th
Zimbabwe rank
38th
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate over time
- Kiribati
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 37.0% against 37.0% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 63 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.6% | 37.4% | 5.2% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 37.0% | 43.0% | 6.0% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vitamin a supplementation coverage rate, Kiribati or Zimbabwe?
- Kiribati, at 37.0% against 37.0% in Zimbabwe as of 2017.
- What is the difference in vitamin a supplementation coverage rate between Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Kiribati and Zimbabwe rank globally for vitamin a supplementation coverage rate?
- Kiribati ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate refers to the percentage of children ages 6-59 months old receiving two high-dose vitamin A supplements in a calendar year.