Kiribati vs Uganda: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate
Kiribati
37.0%
in 2017
Uganda
38.0%
in 2023
Kiribati rank
38th
Uganda rank
37th
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate over time
- Kiribati
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 38.0% against 37.0% in Kiribati, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 38th and Uganda ranks 37th of 63 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.0% | 51.0% | 9.0% | Uganda |
| 2010s | 37.0% | 27.0% | 10.0% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vitamin a supplementation coverage rate, Kiribati or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 38.0% against 37.0% in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in vitamin a supplementation coverage rate between Kiribati and Uganda?
- 1.0%, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Kiribati and Uganda rank globally for vitamin a supplementation coverage rate?
- Kiribati ranks 38th and Uganda ranks 37th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate refers to the percentage of children ages 6-59 months old receiving two high-dose vitamin A supplements in a calendar year.