Kiribati vs Laos: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages) … 6-59
Kiribati
37.0%
in 2017
Laos
36.0%
in 2022
Kiribati rank
38th
Laos rank
40th
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages) … 6-59 over time
- Kiribati
- Laos
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 37.0% against 36.0% in Laos, a difference of 1.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 38th and Laos ranks 40th of 63 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.8% | 61.0% | 21.2% | Laos |
| 2010s | 37.0% | 57.0% | 20.0% | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vitamin a supplementation coverage rate, Kiribati or Laos?
- Kiribati, at 37.0% against 36.0% in Laos as of 2017.
- What is the difference in vitamin a supplementation coverage rate between Kiribati and Laos?
- 1.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Laos?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2017.
- How do Kiribati and Laos rank globally for vitamin a supplementation coverage rate?
- Kiribati ranks 38th and Laos ranks 40th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate refers to the percentage of children ages 6-59 months old receiving two high-dose vitamin A supplements in a calendar year.