Which has higher vitamin a supplementation coverage rate, IDA only or Tanzania?

Tanzania, at 96.0% against 73.4% in IDA only as of 2023.

How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Tanzania?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

IDA only vs Tanzania: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages) … 6-59

IDA only

73.4%

in 2023

Tanzania

96.0%

in 2023

IDA only rank

6th

Tanzania rank

7th

Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages) … 6-59 over time

IDA only
Tanzania

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 96.0% against 73.4% in IDA only, a difference of 22.6%.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.3 times IDA only's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was IDA only ahead.

IDA only ranks 6th and Tanzania ranks 7th of 16 groups.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	IDA only	Tanzania	Difference	Ahead
2000s	68.4%	83.4%	15.0%	Tanzania
2010s	69.4%	92.8%	23.4%	Tanzania
2020s	60.0%	70.8%	10.8%	Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vitamin a supplementation coverage rate, IDA only or Tanzania?: Tanzania, at 96.0% against 73.4% in IDA only as of 2023.
What is the difference in vitamin a supplementation coverage rate between IDA only and Tanzania?: 22.6%, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Tanzania?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do IDA only and Tanzania rank globally for vitamin a supplementation coverage rate?: IDA only ranks 6th and Tanzania ranks 7th of 16 groups.
Where does this data come from?: UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA only vs Tanzania: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/vitamin-a-supplementation-coverage-rate-percent-of-children-ages-6-59-months/ida-only/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/vitamin-a-supplementation-coverage-rate-percent-of-children-ages-6-59-months/ida-only/tanzania/">IDA only vs Tanzania: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months)
Unit: % of children ages 6-59 months
Source: UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 79 places, 1,594 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 29 October 2026

Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate refers to the percentage of children ages 6-59 months old receiving two high-dose vitamin A supplements in a calendar year.