Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Tanzania: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
70.3%
in 2023
Tanzania
96.0%
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
10th
Tanzania rank
7th

Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Tanzania
020406080100200020112023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 96.0% against 70.3% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 25.7%.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.4 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 10th and Tanzania ranks 7th of 16 groups.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 61.7% 82.8% 21.0% Tanzania
2010s 72.2% 92.8% 20.6% Tanzania
2020s 59.5% 70.8% 11.3% Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vitamin a supplementation coverage rate, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 96.0% against 70.3% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in vitamin a supplementation coverage rate between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tanzania?
25.7%, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tanzania?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tanzania rank globally for vitamin a supplementation coverage rate?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 10th and Tanzania ranks 7th of 16 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Tanzania: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/vitamin-a-supplementation-coverage-rate-percent-of-children-ages-6-59-months/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/vitamin-a-supplementation-coverage-rate-percent-of-children-ages-6-59-months/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/tanzania/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Tanzania: Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate (% of children ages 6-59 months)
Unit
% of children ages 6-59 months
Source
UNICEF Global Databases, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
79 places, 1,594 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Vitamin A supplementation coverage rate refers to the percentage of children ages 6-59 months old receiving two high-dose vitamin A supplements in a calendar year.