Marshall Islands vs Namibia: The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Service Coverage Index
Marshall Islands
66
in 2023
Namibia
66
in 2023
Marshall Islands rank
127th
Namibia rank
127th
The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Service Coverage Index over time
- Marshall Islands
- Namibia
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 66 against 66 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 127th and Namibia ranks 127th of 195 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.4 | 53.4 | 13 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 65.8 | 58.7 | 7.1 | Marshall Islands |
| 2020s | 66 | 63.25 | 2.75 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher the universal health coverage (uhc) service coverage index, Marshall Islands or Namibia?
- Marshall Islands, at 66 against 66 in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in the universal health coverage (uhc) service coverage index between Marshall Islands and Namibia?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Namibia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Marshall Islands and Namibia rank globally for the universal health coverage (uhc) service coverage index?
- Marshall Islands ranks 127th and Namibia ranks 127th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Service Coverage Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Service Coverage Index is measured on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) based on the average coverage of essential services including reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases and service capacity and access.