Burundi vs Equatorial Guinea: The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Service Coverage Index
Burundi
48
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
49
in 2023
Burundi rank
163rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
160th
The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Service Coverage Index over time
- Burundi
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 49 against 48 in Burundi, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Burundi ranks 163rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 160th of 195 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29 | 27.3 | 1.7 | Burundi |
| 2010s | 46.1 | 42.5 | 3.6 | Burundi |
| 2020s | 47.25 | 49.5 | 2.25 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher the universal health coverage (uhc) service coverage index, Burundi or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 49 against 48 in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in the universal health coverage (uhc) service coverage index between Burundi and Equatorial Guinea?
- 1, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Equatorial Guinea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for the universal health coverage (uhc) service coverage index?
- Burundi ranks 163rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 160th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Service Coverage Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Service Coverage Index is measured on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) based on the average coverage of essential services including reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases and service capacity and access.