Botswana vs Rwanda: The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Service Coverage Index
Botswana
60
in 2023
Rwanda
59
in 2023
Botswana rank
141st
Rwanda rank
143rd
The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Service Coverage Index over time
- Botswana
- Rwanda
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 60 against 59 in Rwanda, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 141st and Rwanda ranks 143rd of 195 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49 | 26.2 | 22.8 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 57.7 | 50.7 | 7 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 60.5 | 57 | 3.5 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher the universal health coverage (uhc) service coverage index, Botswana or Rwanda?
- Botswana, at 60 against 59 in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in the universal health coverage (uhc) service coverage index between Botswana and Rwanda?
- 1, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Rwanda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Rwanda rank globally for the universal health coverage (uhc) service coverage index?
- Botswana ranks 141st and Rwanda ranks 143rd of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Service Coverage Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Service Coverage Index is measured on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) based on the average coverage of essential services including reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases and service capacity and access.