Chile vs Tokelau: Underweight among adults, BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate)
Chile
0.7%
in 2024
Tokelau
0.5%
in 2024
Chile rank
192nd
Tokelau rank
194th
Underweight among adults, BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) over time
- Chile
- Tokelau
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.7% against 0.5% in Tokelau, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.4 times Tokelau's.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 192nd and Tokelau ranks 194th of 198 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.3% | 1.1% | 2.3% | Chile |
| 1990s | 1.9% | 0.7% | 1.2% | Chile |
| 2000s | 1.2% | 0.5% | 0.7% | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.8% | 0.4% | 0.4% | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.2% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher underweight among adults, bmi < 18.5 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate), Chile or Tokelau?
- Chile, at 0.7% against 0.5% in Tokelau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in underweight among adults, bmi < 18.5 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) between Chile and Tokelau?
- 0.2%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tokelau?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Tokelau rank globally for underweight among adults, bmi < 18.5 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate)?
- Chile ranks 192nd and Tokelau ranks 194th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Underweight among adults, BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.