Nauru vs Zimbabwe: UHC Service Coverage sub-index on service capacity and access
Nauru
72
in 2023
Zimbabwe
71
in 2023
Nauru rank
110th
Zimbabwe rank
112th
UHC Service Coverage sub-index on service capacity and access over time
- Nauru
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 72 against 71 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 112th of 194 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74 | 43.5 | 30.5 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 73 | 54.2 | 18.8 | Nauru |
| 2020s | 71.5 | 67.25 | 4.25 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher uhc service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access, Nauru or Zimbabwe?
- Nauru, at 72 against 71 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in uhc service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access between Nauru and Zimbabwe?
- 1, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Zimbabwe rank globally for uhc service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access?
- Nauru ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 112th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as UHC Service Coverage sub-index on service capacity and access. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.