Japan vs San Marino: UHC Service Coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and
Japan
81
in 2023
San Marino
82
in 2023
Japan rank
41st
San Marino rank
39th
UHC Service Coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and over time
- Japan
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 82 against 81 in Japan, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 41st and San Marino ranks 39th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and San Marino in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.1 | 73.9 | 0.2 | Japan |
| 2010s | 76 | 79.2 | 3.2 | San Marino |
| 2020s | 80.5 | 81.25 | 0.75 | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher uhc service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and, Japan or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 82 against 81 in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in uhc service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and between Japan and San Marino?
- 1, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and San Marino?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Japan and San Marino rank globally for uhc service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and?
- Japan ranks 41st and San Marino ranks 39th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as UHC Service Coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.