Finland vs Mus: UHC Service Coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and
Finland
92
in 2023
Mus
65
in 2023
Finland rank
1st
Mus rank
2nd
UHC Service Coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and over time
- Finland
- Mus
How they compare
Finland currently reports 92 against 65 in Mus, a difference of 27.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.4 times Mus's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 1st and Mus ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Mus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.1 | 62.6 | 26.5 | Finland |
| 2010s | 91.5 | 61.2 | 30.3 | Finland |
| 2020s | 92 | 64.25 | 27.75 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher uhc service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and, Finland or Mus?
- Finland, at 92 against 65 in Mus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in uhc service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and between Finland and Mus?
- 27, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mus?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Mus rank globally for uhc service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and?
- Finland ranks 1st and Mus ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as UHC Service Coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.