Saudi Arabia vs Zambia: Tuberculosis treatment success rate
Saudi Arabia
92.0%
in 2023
Zambia
92.0%
in 2023
Saudi Arabia rank
34th
Zambia rank
34th
Tuberculosis treatment success rate over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Zambia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 92.0% against 92.0% in Zambia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 34th and Zambia ranks 34th of 203 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.5% | 80.7% | 9.2% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 72.1% | 87.4% | 15.3% | Zambia |
| 2020s | 90.5% | 92.0% | 1.5% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tuberculosis treatment success rate, Saudi Arabia or Zambia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 92.0% against 92.0% in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in tuberculosis treatment success rate between Saudi Arabia and Zambia?
- 0.0%, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Zambia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Zambia rank globally for tuberculosis treatment success rate?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 34th and Zambia ranks 34th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Tuberculosis Report, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Tuberculosis treatment success rate (% of new cases). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tuberculosis treatment success rate is the percentage of all new tuberculosis cases (or new and relapse cases for some countries) registered under a national tuberculosis control programme in a given year that successfully completed treatment, with or without bacteriological evidence of success ("cured" and "treatment completed" respectively).