Belarus vs Montenegro: Tuberculosis treatment success rate
Belarus
89.0%
in 2023
Montenegro
89.0%
in 2023
Belarus rank
58th
Montenegro rank
58th
Tuberculosis treatment success rate over time
- Belarus
- Montenegro
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 89.0% against 89.0% in Montenegro, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 58th and Montenegro ranks 58th of 203 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.4% | 63.2% | 19.2% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 85.3% | 88.3% | 3.0% | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 86.2% | 91.0% | 4.8% | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tuberculosis treatment success rate, Belarus or Montenegro?
- Belarus, at 89.0% against 89.0% in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in tuberculosis treatment success rate between Belarus and Montenegro?
- 0.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Montenegro rank globally for tuberculosis treatment success rate?
- Belarus ranks 58th and Montenegro ranks 58th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Tuberculosis Report, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Tuberculosis treatment success rate (% of new cases). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tuberculosis treatment success rate is the percentage of all new tuberculosis cases (or new and relapse cases for some countries) registered under a national tuberculosis control programme in a given year that successfully completed treatment, with or without bacteriological evidence of success ("cured" and "treatment completed" respectively).