American Samoa vs Samoa: Tuberculosis treatment success rate
American Samoa
100.0%
in 2019
Samoa
100.0%
in 2023
American Samoa rank
1st
Samoa rank
1st
Tuberculosis treatment success rate over time
- American Samoa
- Samoa
How they compare
American Samoa currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Samoa, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2000 it was American Samoa ahead.
American Samoa ranks 1st and Samoa ranks 1st of 203 countries.
American Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.8% | 81.4% | 13.4% | American Samoa |
| 2010s | 96.0% | 78.0% | 18.0% | American Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tuberculosis treatment success rate, American Samoa or Samoa?
- American Samoa, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in tuberculosis treatment success rate between American Samoa and Samoa?
- 0.0%, with American Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Samoa?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do American Samoa and Samoa rank globally for tuberculosis treatment success rate?
- American Samoa ranks 1st and Samoa ranks 1st of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Tuberculosis Report, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Tuberculosis treatment success rate (% of new cases). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tuberculosis treatment success rate is the percentage of all new tuberculosis cases (or new and relapse cases for some countries) registered under a national tuberculosis control programme in a given year that successfully completed treatment, with or without bacteriological evidence of success ("cured" and "treatment completed" respectively).