Namibia vs Sri Lanka: Tuberculosis treatment coverage
Namibia
66
in 2024
Sri Lanka
66
in 2024
Namibia rank
151st
Sri Lanka rank
151st
Tuberculosis treatment coverage over time
- Namibia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 66 against 66 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 151st and Sri Lanka ranks 151st of 194 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.9 | 38.7 | 22.2 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 60.3 | 59.2 | 1.1 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 62.6 | 61.8 | 0.8 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tuberculosis treatment coverage, Namibia or Sri Lanka?
- Namibia, at 66 against 66 in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tuberculosis treatment coverage between Namibia and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sri Lanka?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Sri Lanka rank globally for tuberculosis treatment coverage?
- Namibia ranks 151st and Sri Lanka ranks 151st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Tuberculosis treatment coverage. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.