Ghana vs Togo: Tuberculosis prevalence rate
Tuberculosis prevalence rate over time
- Ghana
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 96 per 1000,000 population, WHO against 92 per 1000,000 population, WHO in Ghana, a difference of 4 per 1000,000 population, WHO.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 45th and Togo ranks 43rd of 53 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 258.8 per 1000,000 population, WHO | 90.8 per 1000,000 population, WHO | 168 per 1000,000 population, WHO | Ghana |
| 2000s | 170.1 per 1000,000 population, WHO | 112.6 per 1000,000 population, WHO | 57.5 per 1000,000 population, WHO | Ghana |
| 2010s | 98 per 1000,000 population, WHO | 98 per 1000,000 population, WHO | 0 per 1000,000 population, WHO | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tuberculosis prevalence rate, Ghana or Togo?
- Togo, at 96 per 1000,000 population, WHO against 92 per 1000,000 population, WHO in Ghana as of 2011.
- What is the difference in tuberculosis prevalence rate between Ghana and Togo?
- 4 per 1000,000 population, WHO, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Togo?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Ghana and Togo rank globally for tuberculosis prevalence rate?
- Ghana ranks 45th and Togo ranks 43rd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Tuberculosis Control Report, published as Tuberculosis prevalence rate (per 1000,000 population, WHO). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The number of cases of tuberculosis (all forms) in a population at a given point in time (the middle of the calendar year), expressed as the rate per 100 000 population. It is sometimes referred to as "point prevalence". Estimates include cases of TB in people with HIV. Published values are rounded to three significant figures. Uncertainty bounds are provided in addition to best estimates.