Angola vs Lesotho: Tuberculosis prevalence rate
Tuberculosis prevalence rate over time
- Angola
- Lesotho
How they compare
Angola currently reports 413 per 1000,000 population, WHO against 411 per 1000,000 population, WHO in Lesotho, a difference of 2 per 1000,000 population, WHO.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 17th and Lesotho ranks 18th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 385.3 per 1000,000 population, WHO | 271.5 per 1000,000 population, WHO | 113.8 per 1000,000 population, WHO | Angola |
| 2000s | 326.7 per 1000,000 population, WHO | 400.7 per 1000,000 population, WHO | 74 per 1000,000 population, WHO | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 387 per 1000,000 population, WHO | 409.5 per 1000,000 population, WHO | 22.5 per 1000,000 population, WHO | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tuberculosis prevalence rate, Angola or Lesotho?
- Angola, at 413 per 1000,000 population, WHO against 411 per 1000,000 population, WHO in Lesotho as of 2011.
- What is the difference in tuberculosis prevalence rate between Angola and Lesotho?
- 2 per 1000,000 population, WHO, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Lesotho?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Angola and Lesotho rank globally for tuberculosis prevalence rate?
- Angola ranks 17th and Lesotho ranks 18th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Tuberculosis Control Report, published as Tuberculosis prevalence rate (per 1000,000 population, WHO). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The number of cases of tuberculosis (all forms) in a population at a given point in time (the middle of the calendar year), expressed as the rate per 100 000 population. It is sometimes referred to as "point prevalence". Estimates include cases of TB in people with HIV. Published values are rounded to three significant figures. Uncertainty bounds are provided in addition to best estimates.