Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: Tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
263 per 1000,000 population, WHO
in 2011
Zimbabwe
287 per 1000,000 population, WHO
in 2011
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
8th
Zimbabwe rank
7th

Tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Zimbabwe
100150200250300199020002011

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 287 per 1000,000 population, WHO against 263 per 1000,000 population, WHO in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 24 per 1000,000 population, WHO.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 8th and Zimbabwe ranks 7th of 53 countries.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 275 per 1000,000 population, WHO 102.2 per 1000,000 population, WHO 172.8 per 1000,000 population, WHO Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2000s 261.9 per 1000,000 population, WHO 190 per 1000,000 population, WHO 71.9 per 1000,000 population, WHO Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2010s 261 per 1000,000 population, WHO 252 per 1000,000 population, WHO 9 per 1000,000 population, WHO Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 287 per 1000,000 population, WHO against 263 per 1000,000 population, WHO in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2011.
What is the difference in tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe?
24 per 1000,000 population, WHO, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe?
22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe rank globally for tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 8th and Zimbabwe ranks 7th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Tuberculosis Control Report, published as Tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound (per 1000,000 population, WHO). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: Tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound. Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization, Global Tuberculosis Control Report. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tuberculosis-prevalence-rate-low-uncertainty-bound-per-1000-000-population-who/congo-dem-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tuberculosis-prevalence-rate-low-uncertainty-bound-per-1000-000-population-who/congo-dem-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: Tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound (per 1000,000 population, WHO)
Unit
per 1000,000 population, WHO
Source
World Health Organization, Global Tuberculosis Control Report
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 1,166 data points, 1990–2011
Last refreshed

The number of cases of tuberculosis (all forms) in a population at a given point in time (the middle of the calendar year), expressed as the rate per 100 000 population. It is sometimes referred to as "point prevalence" low uncertainty bound. Estimates include cases of TB in people with HIV. Published values are rounded to three significant figures. Uncertainty bounds are provided in addition to best estimates.